Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: usb: dwc2: remove 'force' parameter from kill_all_requests()

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1636 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:18:30AM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 04:42 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:31:35AM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> >> This patch fixes in simpler way the bug described in [1] and [2]. It
> >> looks like DWC2 is the only UDC driver that doesn't force usb requests
> >> to complete in ep_disable() function. This causes described problem,
> >> because we have no guarantee that all requests will be completed before
> >> unbind of usb function.
> >>
> >> To fix this problem we force all requests of disabled endpoint to complete.
> >> Also currently running request is not handled. This allowed to simplify
> >> code of kill_all_requests() function, because 'force' parameter is always
> >> set to true, so we don't need it anymore.
> >>
> >> In s3c_hsotg_rx_data() we change function used to print message when active
> >> request is NULL from dev_warn() to dev_dbg(), because such situation is
> >> harmless for driver and now it can take place during normal endpoint
> >> disabling.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/9/283
> >> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/12/360
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
> > 
> > this fails to apply:
> > 
> > checking file drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 2602 (offset 35 lines).
> > Hunk #2 FAILED at 2588.
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 2645 (offset 36 lines).
> > Hunk #4 FAILED at 2924.
> > 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED
> > 
> 
> Isn't this patch already in linux-next? I see it's also in your 'next'
> branch.

if it's there, good.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]