public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/entry changes for 3.20, round 1
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:38:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150128143850.GB3994@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVCmoEP-Ha937VurRVxYYmSG==QL=twMBUWgzOAxc4uRA@mail.gmail.com>


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> Hi Ingo and Thomas,
> 
> At Linus' suggestion, I'm trying out some maintainerish stuff for x86
> entry code.  Please consider pulling to an appropriate branch *after
> Paul sends his RCU pull request*, only if 734d16801349 is included in
> that pull request.  If this goes well, maybe I'll submit a MAINTAINERS
> patch, too.
> 
> IMPORTANT: This is based on an RCU change that you don't have yet.  I
> think that Paul is planning on sending a pull request with that change
> fairly soon.  The code in here would compile without that fix, but it
> would introduce a nasty regression, so, to avoid breaking bisection, I
> based this off of the relevant change in Paul's tree.  (It's the very
> first change for 3.20 in his current queue.)
> 
> If you want me to structure this differently, let me know.
> 
> I may have one more entry pull request before the merge window if I
> can get my sysret stuff reviewed in time.  Not sure yet.  I may also
> be comfortable with some more of Denys' cleanups in time.
> 
> The following changes since commit 734d16801349fbe951d2f780191d32c5b8a892d1:
> 
>   rcu: Make rcu_nmi_enter() handle nesting (2014-12-30 17:40:16 -0800)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git
> tags/pr-20150114-x86-entry
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to f6f64681d9d87ded48a90b644b2991c6ee05da2d:
> 
>   x86: entry_64.S: fold SAVE_ARGS_IRQ macro into its sole user
> (2015-01-13 14:18:08 -0800)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This is my accumulated x86 entry work, part 1, for 3.20.  The meat
> of this is an IST rework.  When an IST exception interrupts user
> space, we will handle it on the per-thread kernel stack instead of
> on the IST stack.  This sounds messy, but it actually simplifies the
> IST entry/exit code, because it eliminates some ugly games we used
> to play in order to handle rescheduling, signal delivery, etc on the
> way out of an IST exception.
> 
> The IST rework introduces proper context tracking to IST exception
> handlers.  I haven't seen any bug reports, but the old code could
> have incorrectly treated an IST exception handler as an RCU extended
> quiescent state.
> 
> The memory failure change (included in this pull request with
> Borislav and Tony's permission) eliminates a bunch of code that
> is no longer needed now that user memory failure handlers are
> called in process context.
> 
> Finally, this includes a few on Denys' uncontroversial and Obviously
> Correct (tm) cleanups.
> 
> The IST and memory failure changes have been in -next for a while.
> 
> LKML references:
> 
> IST rework:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1416604491.git.luto@amacapital.net
> 
> Memory failure change:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54ab2ffa301102cd6e@agluck-desk.sc.intel.com
> 
> Denys' cleanups:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1420927210-19738-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Lutomirski (4):
>       x86, entry: Switch stacks on a paranoid entry from userspace
>       x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST context
>       x86: Clean up current_stack_pointer
>       x86, traps: Add ist_begin_non_atomic and ist_end_non_atomic
> 
> Denys Vlasenko (3):
>       x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code
>       x86: ia32entry.S: fix wrong symbolic constant usage: R11->ARGOFFSET
>       x86: entry_64.S: fold SAVE_ARGS_IRQ macro into its sole user
> 
> Tony Luck (1):
>       x86, mce: Get rid of TIF_MCE_NOTIFY and associated mce tricks
> 
>  Documentation/x86/entry_64.txt         |  18 ++-
>  Documentation/x86/x86_64/kernel-stacks |   8 +-
>  arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S              |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h         |   1 -
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h             |   1 -
>  arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h     |  15 ++-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h           |   6 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c       | 114 +++++-------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p5.c        |   6 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/winchip.c   |   5 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S             | 208 ++++++++++++++-------------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c               |  13 +--
>  arch/x86/kernel/signal.c               |   6 -
>  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c                | 108 +++++++++++++----
>  14 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 261 deletions(-)

Pulled into tip:x86/asm - I'll give it some testing as well 
before pushing it out.

Thanks,

	Ingo

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-29  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-15  1:59 [GIT PULL] x86/entry changes for 3.20, round 1 Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-15  9:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-15 10:37   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-01-28 14:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150128143850.GB3994@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox