From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757786AbbA2VIm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:08:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46586 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753418AbbA2VIl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:08:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:07:23 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen Cc: Suresh Siddha , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Fenghua Yu , the arch/x86 maintainers , linux-kernel Subject: [PATCH 0/3]: x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu fixes/cleanups Message-ID: <20150129210723.GA31584@redhat.com> References: <54C2A245.4010307@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54C2A245.4010307@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/23, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Not only is this broken with my new code, but it looks like it may > be broken with the current code, too... Lets (try to) fix unlazy_fpu/save_init_fpu at least. Dave, fpu_save_init() in do_bounds() and task_get_bounds_dir() looks wrong too, shouldn't it use unlazy_fpu() ? See the changelog in 3/3. Oleg.