public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: "mathieu.poirier@linaro.org" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: adding cpu lookup functionality
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:36:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150202153649.GC21175@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422658466-23984-2-git-send-email-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54:25PM +0000, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> 
> Adding a lookup function allowing for quick and easy mapping
> between processor HWID (as found, for example) in DT specifications
> and the CPU index known to the kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
> index 59e282311b58..8e4b011303b1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_SMP_PLAT_H
>  #define __ASM_SMP_PLAT_H
>  
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>  #include <asm/types.h>
>  
>  struct mpidr_hash {
> @@ -40,4 +41,15 @@ static inline u32 mpidr_hash_size(void)
>  extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
>  #define cpu_logical_map(cpu)    __cpu_logical_map[cpu]
>  
> +static inline int get_logical_index(u64 mpidr)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
> +		if (cpu_logical_map(cpu) == mpidr)
> +			return cpu;
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}

Are there some pending updates for of_coresight.c that aren't in
mainline yet? It looks like even with this the parsing would be broken
if /cpus/#address-cells is greater than 1 (as with juno.dts), and it'll
just assume CPU0 in that case.

It would be nicer if we instead had a CPU node to logical ID mapping
function in the core OF code. We already have the inverse with
of_get_cpu_node, so I assume the necessary infrastructure is already
there.

Mark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-02 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-30 22:54 [PATCH 0/2] Coresight Support for arm64 mathieu.poirier
2015-01-30 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: adding cpu lookup functionality mathieu.poirier
2015-02-02 13:50   ` Will Deacon
2015-02-02 21:20     ` Mathieu Poirier
2015-02-02 15:36   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-01-30 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] coresight: Adding coresight support to arm64 mathieu.poirier
2015-02-02 13:45   ` Will Deacon
2015-02-02 22:06     ` Mathieu Poirier
2015-02-03 11:58       ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150202153649.GC21175@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox