Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4

Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-04T20:33:27Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]

Hi James,

On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:56:32 +0000 James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> wrote:
>
> On 4 February 2013 07:39, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Merging signal/for-next (9005965 x86: convert to ksignal)
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/x86/Kconfig
>
> I think this conflict has been resolved incorrectly.
>
> Al's commit 1820f96 "burying unused conditionals" removed
> GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK from config X86, but the merge
> (c5395e2affed5c42200cb6e21e3380995ef22ae3) left GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK
> in:

Thanks, I will fix that today.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]