Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4

Sedat Dilek
2015-02-04T23:48:38Z

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 11:46:32 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 09:18:03 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > The next release I will be making will be next-20150209 - which will
>> >> > probably be after the v3.19 release.
>> >> >
>> >> > Changes since 20150203:
>> >> >
>> >> > The sound-asoc tree gained a conflict against the sound tree.
>> >> >
>> >> > The scsi tree gained a build failure caused by an interaction with the
>> >> > driver-core tree. I applied a merge fix patch.
>> >> >
>> >> > The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I disabled
>> >> > CONFIG_KASAN.
>> >> >
>> >> > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7461
>> >> > 7314 files changed, 309736 insertions(+), 172363 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> [ CC linux-rcu | linux-pm | intel_pstate maintainers ]
>> >
>> > Dirk is not the maintainer of intel_pstate any more, CC: Kristen.
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> after suspend-and-resume I see the following call-trace:
>> >
>> > Do you see that after CPU1 offline too?
>> >
>>
>> NO.
>>
>> After...
>>
>> root# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
>>
>> ...I see this:
>>
>> +[ 707.936668] PM: Saving platform NVS memory
>> +[ 707.936674] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> +[ 707.936712] intel_pstate CPU 2 exiting
>> +[ 707.938024] smpboot: CPU 2 didn't die...
>> +[ 707.949128] intel_pstate CPU 3 exiting
>> +[ 707.950369] smpboot: CPU 3 didn't die...
>> +[ 707.966248] ACPI: Low-level resume complete
>> +[ 707.966302] PM: Restoring platform NVS memory
>>
>> Full dmesg attached.
>
> The dmesg doesn't match what you said above.
>
> Anyway, that's not what I meant. Does the CPU1 offlining alone:
>
> # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
>
> trigger the trace? It should.
>

YES, I see this...
...
[ 84.668616] PPP BSD Compression module registered
[ 84.678072] PPP Deflate Compression module registered
[ 101.143582] intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting
[ 101.157134]
[ 101.157135] ===============================
[ 101.157136] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[ 101.157139] 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.3-iniza-small #1 Not tainted
[ 101.157140] -------------------------------
[ 101.157142] include/trace/events/tlb.h:35 suspicious
rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[ 101.157142]
[ 101.157142] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 101.157142]
[ 101.157143]
[ 101.157143] RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
[ 101.157143] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
[ 101.157144] no locks held by swapper/1/0.
[ 101.157144]
[ 101.157144] stack backtrace:
[ 101.157146] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted
3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.3-iniza-small #1
[ 101.157147] Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
[ 101.157151] 0000000000000001 ffff88011a44fe18 ffffffff817e35fd
0000000000000011
[ 101.157153] ffff88011a448290 ffff88011a44fe48 ffffffff810d6847
ffff8800d3b96100
[ 101.157155] 0000000000000001 ffff88011a44c000 0000000000000005
ffff88011a44fe78
[ 101.157156] Call Trace:
[ 101.157162] [<ffffffff817e35fd>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 101.157166] [<ffffffff810d6847>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
[ 101.157170] [<ffffffff810b71a5>] idle_task_exit+0x205/0x2c0
[ 101.157173] [<ffffffff81054c4e>] play_dead_common+0xe/0x50
[ 101.157175] [<ffffffff81054ca5>] native_play_dead+0x15/0x140
[ 101.157179] [<ffffffff8102963f>] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0xf/0x20
[ 101.157181] [<ffffffff810cd89e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37e/0x580
[ 101.157183] [<ffffffff81053e20>] start_secondary+0x140/0x150
[ 101.157228] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline

- Sedat -