Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4

Sedat Dilek
2015-02-04T15:36:21Z

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> On 02/04/2015 08:21 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/04/2015 05:26 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> The next release I will be making will be next-20150209 - which will
>>>>> probably be after the v3.19 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20150203:
>>>>>
>>>>> The sound-asoc tree gained a conflict against the sound tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> The scsi tree gained a build failure caused by an interaction with the
>>>>> driver-core tree. I applied a merge fix patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I disabled
>>>>> CONFIG_KASAN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7461
>>>>> 7314 files changed, 309736 insertions(+), 172363 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [ CC Jens ]
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am seeing the following in my logs several times...
>>>>
>>>> Feb 4 02:53:13 fambox kernel: [15507.397482] blk_update_request: I/O
>>>> error, dev loop0, sector 21261344
>>>> Feb 4 02:53:13 fambox kernel: [15507.397531] loop0: DISCARD failed.
>>>> Manually zeroing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is from Martin's commit (CC'ed). Martin, there are various ways we
>>> can
>>> end up "failing" from blkdev_issue_discard(), I'm going to kill those
>>> debug
>>> warnings.
>>>
>>
>> [ Really CC Martin :-) ]
>
>
> Ooops, thanks :-)
>
>> Caused by this one...?
>>
>> commit d93ba7a5a97c9f315bacdcdb8de4e5f368e7b396
>> "block: Add discard flag to blkdev_issue_zeroout() function"
>
>
> That's the one.
>

What's the plan... s/pr_warn/pr_debug ?

- Sedat -