From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758588AbbBFXEP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:04:15 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:46944 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755322AbbBFXEN (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:04:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:04:04 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Sedat Dilek Cc: Steven Rostedt , LKML , Dave Hansen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next , Stephen Rothwell , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU Message-ID: <20150206230404.GX5418@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20150206200653.009919583@goodmis.org> <20150206213856.GN5418@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150206173548.48f53ed7@gandalf.local.home> <20150206224836.GU5418@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15020623-0017-0000-0000-000008895327 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:51:19PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Paul E. McKenney > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:35:48PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 23:13:02 +0100 > >> Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> > >> > >> > OK, so both patches go through Steve's tree. > >> > >> The second patch will require acks from those that maintain the files I > >> touch. > > > > Yep, that is required either way. I will give it an Acked-by in the hope > > that this helps. You have another version on the way, or have I lost > > count? ;-) > > Working on x85 and probably using ed as $EDITOR, it will take some time. The 8085, I remember it well! And Cromemco's text editor, which seemed quite fancy at the time. But it would take some doing to fit a git implementation into 64K of memory. ;-) Thanx, Paul