public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tlb/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:58:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150208005937.566738686@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20150208005817.037067701@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0002-x86-tlb-trace-Do-not-trace-on-CPU-that-is-offline.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3066 bytes --]

From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
protection, they must not be called if the current CPU is offline.

Unfortunately, trace_tlb_flush() is called in this scenario as was noted
by LOCKDEP:

...

 Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
 intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting

 ===============================
 smpboot: CPU 1 didn't die...
 [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1 Not tainted
 -------------------------------
 include/trace/events/tlb.h:35 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

 other info that might help us debug this:

 RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
 rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
 no locks held by swapper/1/0.

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1
 Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
  0000000000000001 ffff88011a44fe18 ffffffff817e370d 0000000000000011
  ffff88011a448290 ffff88011a44fe48 ffffffff810d6847 ffff8800c66b9600
  0000000000000001 ffff88011a44c000 ffffffff81cb3900 ffff88011a44fe78
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff817e370d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
  [<ffffffff810d6847>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
  [<ffffffff810b71a5>] idle_task_exit+0x205/0x2c0
  [<ffffffff81054c4e>] play_dead_common+0xe/0x50
  [<ffffffff81054ca5>] native_play_dead+0x15/0x140
  [<ffffffff8102963f>] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0xf/0x20
  [<ffffffff810cd89e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37e/0x580
  [<ffffffff81053e20>] start_secondary+0x140/0x150
 intel_pstate CPU 2 exiting

...

By converting the tlb_flush tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION where the
condition is cpu_online(smp_processor_id()), we can avoid calling RCU protected
code when the CPU is offline.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+icZUUGiGDoL5NU8RuxKzFjoLjEKRtUWx=JB8B9a0EQv-eGzQ@mail.gmail.com

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.17+
Fixes: d17d8f9dedb9 "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes"
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 include/trace/events/tlb.h | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/tlb.h b/include/trace/events/tlb.h
index 13391d288107..0e7635765153 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/tlb.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/tlb.h
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@
 	{ TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN,		"local shootdown" },		\
 	{ TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN,	"local mm shootdown" }
 
-TRACE_EVENT(tlb_flush,
+TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(tlb_flush,
 
 	TP_PROTO(int reason, unsigned long pages),
 	TP_ARGS(reason, pages),
 
+	TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())),
+
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__field(	  int, reason)
 		__field(unsigned long,  pages)
-- 
2.1.4



      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-08  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-08  0:58 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: Fix tlb_flush TP called in RCU ignored location Steven Rostedt
2015-02-08  0:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks Steven Rostedt
2015-02-08  0:58 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150208005937.566738686@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox