From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tlb/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:58:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150208005937.566738686@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20150208005817.037067701@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0002-x86-tlb-trace-Do-not-trace-on-CPU-that-is-offline.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3066 bytes --]
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
protection, they must not be called if the current CPU is offline.
Unfortunately, trace_tlb_flush() is called in this scenario as was noted
by LOCKDEP:
...
Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting
===============================
smpboot: CPU 1 didn't die...
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1 Not tainted
-------------------------------
include/trace/events/tlb.h:35 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
no locks held by swapper/1/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1
Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
0000000000000001 ffff88011a44fe18 ffffffff817e370d 0000000000000011
ffff88011a448290 ffff88011a44fe48 ffffffff810d6847 ffff8800c66b9600
0000000000000001 ffff88011a44c000 ffffffff81cb3900 ffff88011a44fe78
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff817e370d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[<ffffffff810d6847>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
[<ffffffff810b71a5>] idle_task_exit+0x205/0x2c0
[<ffffffff81054c4e>] play_dead_common+0xe/0x50
[<ffffffff81054ca5>] native_play_dead+0x15/0x140
[<ffffffff8102963f>] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0xf/0x20
[<ffffffff810cd89e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37e/0x580
[<ffffffff81053e20>] start_secondary+0x140/0x150
intel_pstate CPU 2 exiting
...
By converting the tlb_flush tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION where the
condition is cpu_online(smp_processor_id()), we can avoid calling RCU protected
code when the CPU is offline.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+icZUUGiGDoL5NU8RuxKzFjoLjEKRtUWx=JB8B9a0EQv-eGzQ@mail.gmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.17+
Fixes: d17d8f9dedb9 "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes"
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
include/trace/events/tlb.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/tlb.h b/include/trace/events/tlb.h
index 13391d288107..0e7635765153 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/tlb.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/tlb.h
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@
{ TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN, "local shootdown" }, \
{ TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN, "local mm shootdown" }
-TRACE_EVENT(tlb_flush,
+TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(tlb_flush,
TP_PROTO(int reason, unsigned long pages),
TP_ARGS(reason, pages),
+ TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())),
+
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field( int, reason)
__field(unsigned long, pages)
--
2.1.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-08 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-08 0:58 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: Fix tlb_flush TP called in RCU ignored location Steven Rostedt
2015-02-08 0:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks Steven Rostedt
2015-02-08 0:58 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150208005937.566738686@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox