* [LKP] [sched/core] 9edfbfed3f5: +88.2% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
@ 2015-02-09 5:58 Huang Ying
2015-02-09 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Huang Ying @ 2015-02-09 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, LKML, LKP ML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4708 bytes --]
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
commit 9edfbfed3f544a7830d99b341f0c175995a02950 ("sched/core: Rework rq->clock update skips")
testbox/testcase/testparams: xps2/hackbench/performance-1600%-process-socket
cebde6d681aa45f9 9edfbfed3f544a7830d99b341f
---------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
1839273 ± 6% +88.2% 3462337 ± 4% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
41965851 ± 5% +5.6% 44307403 ± 1% hackbench.time.voluntary_context_switches
388 ± 39% -58.6% 160 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[1]:/.tg_load_contrib
12957 ± 14% -60.5% 5117 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.tg_load_avg
30505 ± 14% -57.7% 12905 ± 6% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.tg_load_avg
2790 ± 24% -65.4% 964 ± 32% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.blocked_load_avg
2915 ± 23% -62.2% 1101 ± 29% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.tg_load_contrib
1839273 ± 6% +88.2% 3462337 ± 4% time.involuntary_context_switches
1474 ± 28% -61.7% 565 ± 43% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.tg_load_contrib
11830 ± 15% +63.0% 19285 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#4.sched_goidle
19319 ± 29% +91.1% 36913 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#3.sched_goidle
5899 ± 31% -35.6% 3801 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.blocked_load_avg
5999 ± 30% -34.5% 3929 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.tg_load_contrib
37884 ± 13% -33.5% 25207 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.tg_load_avg
229547 ± 5% +47.9% 339519 ± 5% cpuidle.C1-NHM.usage
35712 ± 3% +31.7% 47036 ± 9% cpuidle.C3-NHM.usage
5010 ± 9% -29.0% 3556 ± 20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.blocked_load_avg
5139 ± 9% -28.2% 3690 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_load_contrib
49568 ± 6% +24.8% 61867 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_goidle
26369 ± 35% -42.0% 15289 ± 29% cpuidle.C6-NHM.usage
18 ± 16% +36.5% 25 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#4.nr_running
1.41 ± 12% -19.3% 1.14 ± 13% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.sock_wfree.unix_destruct_scm.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb
25 ± 15% +28.7% 32 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#3.nr_running
1.63 ± 11% -18.0% 1.34 ± 12% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.unix_destruct_scm.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg
0.57 ± 8% +9.6% 0.62 ± 5% turbostat.CPU%c1
148 ± 11% -16.7% 123 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[1]:/.load
109 ± 6% +17.1% 128 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[0]
2.41 ± 8% -13.3% 2.09 ± 11% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_aio_read
147 ± 12% -16.4% 123 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#1.load
111 ± 5% +15.4% 129 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[2]
110 ± 5% +14.9% 127 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.runnable_load_avg
112 ± 5% +14.5% 128 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[3]
113 ± 5% +13.2% 128 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[4]
789953 ± 2% -10.8% 704528 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#3.avg_idle
15471 ± 5% -7.7% 14278 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.curr->pid
2675106 ± 10% +16.2% 3109411 ± 1% sched_debug.cpu#4.nr_switches
2675140 ± 10% +16.2% 3109440 ± 1% sched_debug.cpu#4.sched_count
155201 ± 5% +14.6% 177901 ± 3% softirqs.RCU
8.64 ± 6% -9.6% 7.82 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_aio_read.sock_aio_read
2658351 ± 11% +13.7% 3021564 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.sched_count
2658326 ± 11% +13.7% 3021539 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.nr_switches
71443 ± 5% +9.9% 78486 ± 0% vmstat.system.cs
8209 ± 5% +7.3% 8805 ± 0% vmstat.system.in
xps2: Nehalem
Memory: 4G
To reproduce:
apt-get install ruby ruby-oj
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/setup-local job.yaml # the job file attached in this email
bin/run-local job.yaml
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Huang, Ying
[-- Attachment #2: reproduce --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 51 bytes --]
tbench_srv &
tbench 4 127.0.0.1
killall tbench_srv
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 89 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
LKP mailing list
LKP@linux.intel.com
\r
[-- Attachment #4: job.yaml --]
[-- Type: application/x-yaml, Size: 1685 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [LKP] [sched/core] 9edfbfed3f5: +88.2% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
2015-02-09 5:58 [LKP] [sched/core] 9edfbfed3f5: +88.2% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches Huang Ying
@ 2015-02-09 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <CAC=cRTN3VKmgM4BYUrN=rMfg8stiP-F_oWR+2LSPFR9m1Wmfqg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-10 7:26 ` Markus Pargmann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2015-02-09 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huang Ying; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, LKML, LKP ML
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:58:33PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
> commit 9edfbfed3f544a7830d99b341f0c175995a02950 ("sched/core: Rework rq->clock update skips")
>
>
> testbox/testcase/testparams: xps2/hackbench/performance-1600%-process-socket
>
> cebde6d681aa45f9 9edfbfed3f544a7830d99b341f
> ---------------- --------------------------
> %stddev %change %stddev
> \ | \
> 1839273 ± 6% +88.2% 3462337 ± 4% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> 41965851 ± 5% +5.6% 44307403 ± 1% hackbench.time.voluntary_context_switches
> 388 ± 39% -58.6% 160 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[1]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 12957 ± 14% -60.5% 5117 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.tg_load_avg
> 30505 ± 14% -57.7% 12905 ± 6% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.tg_load_avg
> 2790 ± 24% -65.4% 964 ± 32% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.blocked_load_avg
> 2915 ± 23% -62.2% 1101 ± 29% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 1839273 ± 6% +88.2% 3462337 ± 4% time.involuntary_context_switches
> 1474 ± 28% -61.7% 565 ± 43% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 11830 ± 15% +63.0% 19285 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#4.sched_goidle
> 19319 ± 29% +91.1% 36913 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#3.sched_goidle
> 5899 ± 31% -35.6% 3801 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.blocked_load_avg
> 5999 ± 30% -34.5% 3929 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 37884 ± 13% -33.5% 25207 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.tg_load_avg
> 229547 ± 5% +47.9% 339519 ± 5% cpuidle.C1-NHM.usage
> 35712 ± 3% +31.7% 47036 ± 9% cpuidle.C3-NHM.usage
> 5010 ± 9% -29.0% 3556 ± 20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.blocked_load_avg
> 5139 ± 9% -28.2% 3690 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 49568 ± 6% +24.8% 61867 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_goidle
> 26369 ± 35% -42.0% 15289 ± 29% cpuidle.C6-NHM.usage
> 18 ± 16% +36.5% 25 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#4.nr_running
> 1.41 ± 12% -19.3% 1.14 ± 13% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.sock_wfree.unix_destruct_scm.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb
> 25 ± 15% +28.7% 32 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#3.nr_running
> 1.63 ± 11% -18.0% 1.34 ± 12% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.unix_destruct_scm.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 0.57 ± 8% +9.6% 0.62 ± 5% turbostat.CPU%c1
> 148 ± 11% -16.7% 123 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[1]:/.load
> 109 ± 6% +17.1% 128 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[0]
> 2.41 ± 8% -13.3% 2.09 ± 11% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_aio_read
> 147 ± 12% -16.4% 123 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#1.load
> 111 ± 5% +15.4% 129 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[2]
> 110 ± 5% +14.9% 127 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.runnable_load_avg
> 112 ± 5% +14.5% 128 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[3]
> 113 ± 5% +13.2% 128 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[4]
> 789953 ± 2% -10.8% 704528 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#3.avg_idle
> 15471 ± 5% -7.7% 14278 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.curr->pid
> 2675106 ± 10% +16.2% 3109411 ± 1% sched_debug.cpu#4.nr_switches
> 2675140 ± 10% +16.2% 3109440 ± 1% sched_debug.cpu#4.sched_count
> 155201 ± 5% +14.6% 177901 ± 3% softirqs.RCU
> 8.64 ± 6% -9.6% 7.82 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_aio_read.sock_aio_read
> 2658351 ± 11% +13.7% 3021564 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.sched_count
> 2658326 ± 11% +13.7% 3021539 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.nr_switches
> 71443 ± 5% +9.9% 78486 ± 0% vmstat.system.cs
> 8209 ± 5% +7.3% 8805 ± 0% vmstat.system.in
>
OK, so the interesting number is total runtime; I cannot find it.
Therefore I cannot say what if anything changed. This is just a bunch of
random numbers afaict.
> To reproduce:
>
> apt-get install ruby ruby-oj
Mostly likely, you requiring ruby just means I will not be reproducing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CAC=cRTN3VKmgM4BYUrN=rMfg8stiP-F_oWR+2LSPFR9m1Wmfqg@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [LKP] [sched/core] 9edfbfed3f5: +88.2% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
[not found] ` <CAC=cRTN3VKmgM4BYUrN=rMfg8stiP-F_oWR+2LSPFR9m1Wmfqg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2015-02-09 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2015-02-09 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: huang ying; +Cc: Huang Ying, Ingo Molnar, LKML, LKP ML, Wu, Fengguang
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 04:47:07PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> There are no distinguishable difference between the parent and the child
> for hackbench throughput number.
>
> Usually you will not consider statistics such as involuntary context
> switches?
Only if there's a 'problem' with the primary performance metric (total
runtime in case of hackbench).
Once the primary metric shifts, you go look at what the cause of this
change might be, at that point things like # context switches etc.. are
interesting. As long as the primary performance metric is stable, meh.
As such; I would suggest _always_ reporting the primary metric for each
benchmark, preferably on top and not hidden somewhere in the mass of
numbers.
I now had to very carefully waste a few minutes of my time reading those
numbers to see if there was anything useful in; there wasn't.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LKP] [sched/core] 9edfbfed3f5: +88.2% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
2015-02-09 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <CAC=cRTN3VKmgM4BYUrN=rMfg8stiP-F_oWR+2LSPFR9m1Wmfqg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2015-02-10 7:26 ` Markus Pargmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Markus Pargmann @ 2015-02-10 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Huang Ying, Ingo Molnar, LKML, LKP ML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5296 bytes --]
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 09:31:20AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:58:33PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
> > commit 9edfbfed3f544a7830d99b341f0c175995a02950 ("sched/core: Rework rq->clock update skips")
> >
> >
> > testbox/testcase/testparams: xps2/hackbench/performance-1600%-process-socket
> >
> > cebde6d681aa45f9 9edfbfed3f544a7830d99b341f
> > ---------------- --------------------------
> > %stddev %change %stddev
> > \ | \
> > 1839273 ± 6% +88.2% 3462337 ± 4% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> > 41965851 ± 5% +5.6% 44307403 ± 1% hackbench.time.voluntary_context_switches
> > 388 ± 39% -58.6% 160 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[1]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 12957 ± 14% -60.5% 5117 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.tg_load_avg
> > 30505 ± 14% -57.7% 12905 ± 6% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.tg_load_avg
> > 2790 ± 24% -65.4% 964 ± 32% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.blocked_load_avg
> > 2915 ± 23% -62.2% 1101 ± 29% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 1839273 ± 6% +88.2% 3462337 ± 4% time.involuntary_context_switches
> > 1474 ± 28% -61.7% 565 ± 43% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 11830 ± 15% +63.0% 19285 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#4.sched_goidle
> > 19319 ± 29% +91.1% 36913 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#3.sched_goidle
> > 5899 ± 31% -35.6% 3801 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.blocked_load_avg
> > 5999 ± 30% -34.5% 3929 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 37884 ± 13% -33.5% 25207 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.tg_load_avg
> > 229547 ± 5% +47.9% 339519 ± 5% cpuidle.C1-NHM.usage
> > 35712 ± 3% +31.7% 47036 ± 9% cpuidle.C3-NHM.usage
> > 5010 ± 9% -29.0% 3556 ± 20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.blocked_load_avg
> > 5139 ± 9% -28.2% 3690 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 49568 ± 6% +24.8% 61867 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_goidle
> > 26369 ± 35% -42.0% 15289 ± 29% cpuidle.C6-NHM.usage
> > 18 ± 16% +36.5% 25 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#4.nr_running
> > 1.41 ± 12% -19.3% 1.14 ± 13% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.sock_wfree.unix_destruct_scm.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb
> > 25 ± 15% +28.7% 32 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#3.nr_running
> > 1.63 ± 11% -18.0% 1.34 ± 12% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.unix_destruct_scm.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg
> > 0.57 ± 8% +9.6% 0.62 ± 5% turbostat.CPU%c1
> > 148 ± 11% -16.7% 123 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[1]:/.load
> > 109 ± 6% +17.1% 128 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[0]
> > 2.41 ± 8% -13.3% 2.09 ± 11% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.skb_release_head_state.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_aio_read
> > 147 ± 12% -16.4% 123 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#1.load
> > 111 ± 5% +15.4% 129 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[2]
> > 110 ± 5% +14.9% 127 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.runnable_load_avg
> > 112 ± 5% +14.5% 128 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[3]
> > 113 ± 5% +13.2% 128 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[4]
> > 789953 ± 2% -10.8% 704528 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#3.avg_idle
> > 15471 ± 5% -7.7% 14278 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.curr->pid
> > 2675106 ± 10% +16.2% 3109411 ± 1% sched_debug.cpu#4.nr_switches
> > 2675140 ± 10% +16.2% 3109440 ± 1% sched_debug.cpu#4.sched_count
> > 155201 ± 5% +14.6% 177901 ± 3% softirqs.RCU
> > 8.64 ± 6% -9.6% 7.82 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.skb_release_all.consume_skb.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_aio_read.sock_aio_read
> > 2658351 ± 11% +13.7% 3021564 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.sched_count
> > 2658326 ± 11% +13.7% 3021539 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#5.nr_switches
> > 71443 ± 5% +9.9% 78486 ± 0% vmstat.system.cs
> > 8209 ± 5% +7.3% 8805 ± 0% vmstat.system.in
> >
>
> OK, so the interesting number is total runtime; I cannot find it.
> Therefore I cannot say what if anything changed. This is just a bunch of
> random numbers afaict.
The total runtime of hackbench in v3.19 compared to v3.15 to v3.18 is
shown here [1] (Group 5 -> linux_perf.hackbench). It is not the same
project so the profiling data is not related and not recorded. The
results should be reproducable by simply running hackbench with the same
options as cbenchsuite [2] did. The options are always listed in the
result browser [1] below the plots.
Best Regards,
Markus
[1] http://results.cbenchsuite.org/plots/2015-02-09__v3.15-v3.19-quad/detailed/
[2] http://cbenchsuite.org
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-10 7:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-09 5:58 [LKP] [sched/core] 9edfbfed3f5: +88.2% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches Huang Ying
2015-02-09 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <CAC=cRTN3VKmgM4BYUrN=rMfg8stiP-F_oWR+2LSPFR9m1Wmfqg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-09 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-10 7:26 ` Markus Pargmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox