public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: linux@horizon.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
	davem@davemloft.net, dborkman@redhat.com,
	hannes@stressinduktion.org, klimov.linux@gmail.com,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	msalter@redhat.com, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, tgraf@suug.ch,
	valentinrothberg@gmail.com, yury.norov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation
Date: 9 Feb 2015 11:45:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150209164542.10207.qmail@ns.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wq3rs3lp.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

Sorry, I screwed up the bit-twiddling while messing with various options.
I was trying to get size == 32 to work; that should have been:

> 	tmp &= (2UL << ((size-1) % BITS_PER_LONG)) - 1;	/* Mask last word */

And you're right that LAST_WORD_MASK is a good wrapper.

Vasrious working solutions include:
#define LAST_WORD_MASK(bits) 	((2UL << (bits-1) % BITS_PER_LONG) - 1)
#define LAST_WORD_MASK(bits) 	~(~0UL << bits % BITS_PER_LONG)
#define LAST_WORD_MASK(bits) 	(~0UL >> -bits % BITS_PER_LONG)

I'm not sure which generates the nicest code.  It's 4 instructions
each way, with the last being 1 byte smaller:

0000000000000000 <lwm1>:
   0:   8d 4f ff                lea    -0x1(%rdi),%ecx
   3:   b8 02 00 00 00          mov    $0x2,%eax
   8:   48 d3 e0                shl    %cl,%rax
   b:   48 83 e8 01             sub    $0x1,%rax
   f:   c3                      retq   

0000000000000010 <lwm2>:
  10:   48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff    mov    $0xffffffffffffffff,%rax
  17:   89 f9                   mov    %edi,%ecx
  19:   48 d3 e0                shl    %cl,%rax
  1c:   48 f7 d0                not    %rax
  1f:   c3                      retq   

0000000000000020 <lwm3>:
  20:   89 f9                   mov    %edi,%ecx
  22:   f7 d9                   neg    %ecx
  24:   48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff    mov    $0xffffffffffffffff,%rax
  2b:   48 d3 e8                shr    %cl,%rax
  2e:   c3                      retq   


> Also, I think it is best to handle size==0 appropriately, meaning that
> one cannot dereference addr in any way (and certainly not addr[-1]).

Ah, okay; l I figured that was a safe case to omit.  But your solution is nicer
than mine overall.

It may be that omitting the mask *is* safe, but it's a lot of wading through
callers to prove it.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-09 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-08 14:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation Yury Norov
2015-02-08 14:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Yury Norov
2015-02-08 18:48   ` George Spelvin
2015-02-09  8:32   ` George Spelvin
2015-02-09 11:53     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-09 16:45       ` George Spelvin [this message]
2015-02-11 22:14         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-11 23:05       ` Yury
2015-02-12  8:15         ` George Spelvin
2015-02-12  9:58           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-12 23:46             ` George Spelvin
2015-02-13 10:13               ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-08 14:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] lib: move find_last_bit to lib/find_next_bit.c Yury Norov
2015-02-08 14:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] lib: rename lib/find_next_bit.c to lib/find_bit.c Yury Norov
2015-02-17  2:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation Yury Norov
2015-02-17  2:35   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Yury Norov
2015-02-18 17:57     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-17  2:35   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] lib: move find_last_bit to lib/find_next_bit.c Yury Norov
2015-02-17  2:35   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] lib: rename lib/find_next_bit.c to lib/find_bit.c Yury Norov
2015-02-22 17:24 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation Yury Norov
2015-02-22 17:24   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Yury Norov
2015-02-23 21:50     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-24  0:29       ` George Spelvin
2015-02-22 17:24   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] lib: move find_last_bit to lib/find_next_bit.c Yury Norov
2015-02-22 17:24   ` [PATCH v5 3/3] lib: rename lib/find_next_bit.c to lib/find_bit.c Yury Norov
2015-02-24  0:40   ` [PATCH v5 0/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation Andrew Morton
2015-03-08 18:17     ` Yury Norov
     [not found] <CAAH8bW-mk0kk-GKDNny6hsjrbcjwdcAacsF_DEaXmNG==hXhRw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-13 21:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " George Spelvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150209164542.10207.qmail@ns.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=klimov.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox