From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751983AbbBJFUT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:20:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:56694 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750888AbbBJFUR (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:20:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:50:06 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Benjamin Romer , David Kershner , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, sparmaintainer@unisys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: unisys: remove unused variable Message-ID: <20150210052006.GA5223@sudip-PC> References: <1423226603-5443-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20150207092216.GB21816@kroah.com> <20150208110107.GA4091@sudip-PC> <20150209213540.GB11071@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150209213540.GB11071@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:35:40AM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 04:31:07PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:22:16PM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 06:13:21PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > we were getting lots of warnings about _tempresult set but not used. > > > > _tempresult was used in the macro ISSUE_IO_VMCALL_POSTCODE_SEVERITY > > > > which was again using another macro ISSUE_IO_EXTENDED_VMCALL. > > > > but the vallue assigned to it was never used. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > > > > > > Your From: address, and this address don't match, so I can't take this > > > :( > > > > all my patches have been like this way, and you have taken them before :) > > the reason its like this way - (already discussed with Dan Carpenter, reference https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/473) > > > > we have strict DMARC check for the corporate mail server. DMARC = domain based message authentication. > > So the mail i sent reached all the list subscriber from a different server than our designated server, > > and as a result it is marked as spam in many places and I have already received a few complaints regarding that. > > > > so at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/535 Dan said its ok for him, but depends on you if you want to accept. > > And since you have accepted all my patches before so i thought it is ok with you. > > I didn't notice it before, sorry. no problem. we all know how much busy you are .. :) > > > if you want I can add an extra From: line, but Dan has already given his commments for that at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/135 > > quoting him : > > > > "If everyone starts using From headers like this then it becomes a pain to deal with." > > It's not a pain to deal with on my end at all. > > But as I've missed this in the past, nevermind, I'll take it as is. Can > you resend your outstanding patches and I'll queue them up after > 3.20-rc1 is out. i will resend them now or should i send after the merge window closes? and on 07th feb you have added my two patches to staging-testing, but it still is not in linux-next, do i need to resend them also or they are in process so nothing to do from my side? regards sudip > > thanks, > > greg k-h