From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Cc: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ldv-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: fix memory leaks on failure path in edac_init()
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:02:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150211120203.GA774@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150206115053.GC3220@pd.tnic>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:50:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:12:42PM -0800, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> > edac_init() does not deallocate already allocated resources on failure path.
> >
> > Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
This causes section mismatches because the
edac_{debugfs,mc_sysfs}_exit() functions have __exit annotation but
you've added them to an __init-annotated function. And I should've
caught that :-\
Anyway, here's a fix I'm queueing ontop:
---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC: Fix section mismatches from edac_init unwind path
192580b45e8e ("EDAC: Properly unwind on failure path in edac_init()")
added an unwind path in case of error but those functions have __exit
annotation and are being used in an __init function, leading to section
mismatches. Drop the section annotation and make them normal functions.
Cc: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
index 3a283819970b..112d63ad1154 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ int __init edac_debugfs_init(void)
return 0;
}
-void __exit edac_debugfs_exit(void)
+void edac_debugfs_exit(void)
{
debugfs_remove(edac_debugfs);
}
@@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ int __init edac_mc_sysfs_init(void)
return err;
}
-void __exit edac_mc_sysfs_exit(void)
+void edac_mc_sysfs_exit(void)
{
device_unregister(mci_pdev);
edac_put_sysfs_subsys();
--
2.2.0.33.gc18b867
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-11 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 6:12 [PATCH] edac: fix memory leaks on failure path in edac_init() Alexey Khoroshilov
2015-02-06 11:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-11 12:02 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150211120203.GA774@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
--cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox