From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:17:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150212171754.GD24269@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423691753-16279-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:55:52PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> 64-bit code was using six stack slots less by not saving/restoring
> registers which are callee-preserved according to C ABI,
> and not allocating space for them.
> Only when syscall needed a complete "struct pt_regs",
> the complete area was allocated and filled in.
> As an additional twist, on interrupt entry a "slightly less truncated pt_regs"
> trick is used, to make nested interrupt stacks easier to unwind.
>
> This proved to be a source of significant obfuscation and subtle bugs.
> For example, stub_fork had to pop the return address,
> extend the struct, save registers, and push return address back. Ugly.
> ia32_ptregs_common pops return address and "returns" via jmp insn,
> throwing a wrench into CPU return stack cache.
>
> This patch changes code to always allocate a complete "struct pt_regs".
> The saving of registers is still done lazily.
>
> "Partial pt_regs" trick on interrupt stack is retained.
>
> Macros which manipulate "struct pt_regs" on stack are reworked:
> ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK allocates the structure.
> SAVE_C_REGS saves to it those registers which are clobbered by C code.
> SAVE_EXTRA_REGS saves to it all other registers.
> Corresponding RESTORE_* and REMOVE_PT_GPREGS_FROM_STACK macros reverse it.
>
> ia32_ptregs_common, stub_fork and friends lost their ugly dance with
> return pointer.
>
> LOAD_ARGS32 in ia32entry.S now uses symbolic stack offsets
> instead of magic numbers.
>
> error_entry and save_paranoid now use SAVE_C_REGS + SAVE_EXTRA_REGS
> instead of having it open-coded yet again.
>
> Patch was run-tested: 64-bit executables, 32-bit executables,
> strace works.
> Timing tests did not show measurable difference in 32-bit
> and 64-bit syscalls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> CC: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
> CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
> CC: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S | 47 +++----
> arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h | 222 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h | 4 +-
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ptrace-abi.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 192 +++++++++++-----------------
You'd need to redo that patch against latest upstream because of changes
it is missing:
Andy's branch x86/entry should have them too:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:760: Error: no such instruction: `restore_args 1,8,1'
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [arch/x86] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-12 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-11 21:55 [PATCH 1/2] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-11 21:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: entry_64.S: fix comments. No code changes Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-12 17:17 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-02-12 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-12 22:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-13 1:54 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-13 2:59 ` Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150212171754.GD24269@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox