public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:52:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150213155208.GG10496@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54DA725E.6080305@codeaurora.org>

[...]

> > Aside: For that last row we really should be setting cpu->hotpluggable
> > in struct cpu based on what cpu_ops::cpu_disable returns (from what I
> > can tell we use that op to indicate if a CPU can be hotplugged).
> >
> 
> There's a patch for that (tm).
> 
> ----8<----
> 
> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if hotpluggable
> 
> Writes to /sys/.../cpuX/online fail if we determine the platform
> doesn't support hotplug for that CPU. Let's figure this out
> befoer we make the sysfs nodes so that the online file doesn't
> even exist if it's not possible to hotplug the CPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h |  6 ++++++
>  arch/arm/kernel/setup.c    |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/kernel/smp.c      | 11 ++++-------
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> index 18f5a554134f..9f82430efd59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -123,4 +123,10 @@ struct of_cpu_method {
>   */
>  extern void smp_set_ops(struct smp_operations *);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +extern int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +#else
> +static inline int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; }
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* ifndef __ASM_ARM_SMP_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> index 715ae19bc7c8..c61c09defc78 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
>  
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>  		struct cpuinfo_arm *cpuinfo = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu);
> -		cpuinfo->cpu.hotpluggable = 1;
> +		cpuinfo->cpu.hotpluggable = platform_can_hotplug_cpu(cpu);
>  		register_cpu(&cpuinfo->cpu, cpu);
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> index fe0386c751b2..4d213b24db60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -174,18 +174,19 @@ static int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -static int platform_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> +int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	if (smp_ops.cpu_disable)
> -		return smp_ops.cpu_disable(cpu);
> +		return smp_ops.cpu_disable(cpu) ? 0 : 1;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * By default, allow disabling all CPUs except the first one,
>  	 * since this is special on a lot of platforms, e.g. because
>  	 * of clock tick interrupts.
>  	 */
> -	return cpu == 0 ? -EPERM : 0;
> +	return cpu == 0 ? 0 : 1;
>  }
> +
>  /*
>   * __cpu_disable runs on the processor to be shutdown.
>   */
> @@ -194,10 +195,6 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
>  	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = platform_cpu_disable(cpu);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;

For PSCI 0.2+ I was hoping to hook the MIGRATE logic in here. The secure
side may reject hotplugging of a CPU, but it's a dynamic property of the
system and so can't be probed once at boot time.

I guess when I manage to get around to that I can restore a hook here.

Thanks,
Mark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-13 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-05 10:14 [PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 11:00   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 11:08     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 11:28   ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 11:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 14:29   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 16:11     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 17:02       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 17:34         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 17:54           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10  1:24       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10  1:37         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10  2:05           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10  3:05             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 15:14         ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-10 20:48           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 21:04             ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 21:15               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 21:49                 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 22:05                   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 15:52               ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-02-13 16:27                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 17:21                   ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-13 17:30                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 16:28                 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 15:38             ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-10 20:58           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 15:41         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 18:33           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-25 12:56       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25 16:47         ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 17:00           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25 18:13             ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 20:16               ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-26  1:05                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-22 23:30                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 12:55                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-23 13:21                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 14:00                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-23 15:37                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 16:56                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-26 19:14           ` Daniel Thompson
2015-02-26 19:47             ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-05 10:53 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 10:59   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150213155208.GG10496@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox