From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
waiman.long@hp.com, raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/completion: completion_done() should serialize with complete()
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:21:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150216082113.GY5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150212195913.GA30430@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 08:59:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Commit de30ec47302c "Remove unnecessary ->wait.lock serialization when
> reading completion state" was not correct, without lock/unlock the code
> like stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu()
>
> while (!completion_done())
> cpu_relax();
>
> can return before complete() finishes its spin_unlock() which writes to
> this memory. And spin_unlock_wait().
>
> While at it, change try_wait_for_completion() to use READ_ONCE().
So I share Davidlohrs concern if we should not simply revert that
change; but given we've now gone over it detail I suppose we should just
keep the optimized version.
I did add a comment to your patch; and queued the below for
sched/urgent.
---
Subject: sched/completion: completion_done() should serialize with complete()
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:59:13 +0100
Commit de30ec47302c "Remove unnecessary ->wait.lock serialization when
reading completion state" was not correct, without lock/unlock the code
like stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu()
while (!completion_done())
cpu_relax();
can return before complete() finishes its spin_unlock() which writes to
this memory. And spin_unlock_wait().
While at it, change try_wait_for_completion() to use READ_ONCE().
Fixes: de30ec47302c ("sched/completion: Remove unnecessary ->wait.lock serialization when reading completion state")
Cc: waiman.long@hp.com
Cc: raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
[peterz: Add a comment with the barrier]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150212195913.GA30430@redhat.com
---
kernel/sched/completion.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/completion.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/completion.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ bool try_wait_for_completion(struct comp
* first without taking the lock so we can
* return early in the blocking case.
*/
- if (!ACCESS_ONCE(x->done))
+ if (!READ_ONCE(x->done))
return 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
@@ -297,6 +297,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_wait_for_completion);
*/
bool completion_done(struct completion *x)
{
- return !!ACCESS_ONCE(x->done);
+ if (!READ_ONCE(x->done))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * If ->done, we need to wait for complete() to release ->wait.lock
+ * otherwise we can end up freeing the completion before complete()
+ * is done referencing it.
+ *
+ * The RMB pairs with complete()'s RELEASE of ->wait.lock and orders
+ * the loads of ->done and ->wait.lock such that we cannot observe
+ * the lock before complete() acquires it while observing the ->done
+ * after it's acquired the lock.
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
+ spin_unlock_wait(&x->wait.lock);
+ return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(completion_done);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-12 0:34 BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, migration/0/9 Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-12 3:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-12 3:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-12 17:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 17:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 17:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-12 19:10 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-12 19:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 21:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-13 18:17 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-13 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-14 8:35 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-14 14:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 19:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-12 19:32 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-12 19:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 19:59 ` [PATCH] sched/completion: completion_done() should serialize with complete() Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-13 21:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-13 21:56 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-13 22:02 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-16 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-02-16 16:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 17:06 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/completion: Serialize completion_done() " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150216082113.GY5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox