public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] please pull file-locking related changes for v3.20
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:45:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150217194511.GE27900@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyM6yifUDZdUF=8wsbJY-NGvs74SCZpp5u7Wnhbxq6Qhg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:41:40AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> wrote:
> >
> > What about this instead then?
> 
> No. Really.
> 
> > - leave the "drop the spinlock" thing in place in flock_lock_file for
> >   v3.20
> 
> No. The whole concept of "drop the lock in the middle" is *BROKEN*.
> It's seriously crap. It's not just a bug, it's a really fundamentally
> wrong thing to do.
> 
> > - change locks_remove_flock to just walk the list and delete any locks
> >   associated with the filp being closed
> 
> No. That's still wrong. You can have two people holding a write-lock.
> Seriously. That's *shit*.
> 
> The "drop the spinlock in the middle" must go. There's not even any
> reason for it. Just get rid of it. There can be no deadlock if you get
> rid of it, because
> 
>  - we hold the flc_lock over the whole event, so we can never see any
> half-way state
> 
>  - if we actually decide to sleep (due to conflicting locks) and
> return FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED, we will drop the lock before actually
> sleeping, so nobody else will be deadlocking on this file lock. So any
> *other* person who tries to do an upgrade will not sleep, because the
> pending upgrade will have moved to the blocking list (that whole
> "locks_insert_block" part.

Whoops, you're right, I was forgetting that wait happens up in
flock_lock_file_wait(), OK.

--b.

> Ergo, either we'll upgrade the lock (atomically, within flc_lock), or
> we will drop the lock (possibly moving it to the blocking list). I
> don't see a deadlock.
> 
> I think your (and mine - but mine had the more fundamental problem of
> never setting "old_fl" correctly at all) patch had a deadlock because
> you didn't actually remove the old lock when you returned
> FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED.
> 
> But I think the correct minimal patch is actually to just remove the
> "if (found)" statement.
> 
>                        Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-17 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-09 10:55 [GIT PULL] please pull file-locking related changes for v3.20 Jeff Layton
2015-02-16 13:32 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-02-16 14:00   ` Jeff Layton
2015-02-16 18:46     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-16 19:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-16 19:59         ` Jeff Layton
2015-02-17  0:02         ` Jeff Layton
2015-02-17  0:21           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-17  0:35             ` Jeff Layton
2015-02-17 19:08         ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-02-17 19:13           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-17 19:27             ` Jeff Layton
2015-02-17 19:41               ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-17 19:45                 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2015-02-17 20:12                 ` Jeff Layton
2015-02-17 20:17                   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-17 19:29             ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-26 11:00             ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-02-26 14:45               ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-02-26 15:09                 ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150217194511.GE27900@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox