From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, ak@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, cel@us.ibm.com,
sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sonnyrao@chromium.org,
johnmccutchan@google.com, dsahern@gmail.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, pawell.moll@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clock: add perf_clock posix clock
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 18:53:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150218175354.GA31963@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424280109-9801-5-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
* Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> wrote:
> This patch is a re-packaging of David's Ahern
> posix perf clock available here:
>
> https://github.com/dsahern/linux/blob/perf-full-monty/README.ahern
>
> The patch itself is based on Pawel Moll's original post:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/14/523
>
> The new clock is call PERF_CLOCK. To use it
>
> #include <time.h>
> #include <linux/time.h>
>
> struct timespec ts;
>
> clock_gettime(PERF_CLOCK, &ts);
So what's the justification for this new clock, as opposed
to say CLOCK_MONOTONIC?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-18 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-18 17:21 [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: add support for profiling jitted code Stephane Eranian
2015-02-18 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf tools: add Java demangling support Stephane Eranian
2015-02-18 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf inject: add jitdump mmap injection support Stephane Eranian
2015-02-18 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tools: add JVMTI agent library Stephane Eranian
2015-02-18 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] clock: add perf_clock posix clock Stephane Eranian
2015-02-18 17:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-02-18 18:00 ` John Stultz
2015-02-18 18:10 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-02-18 18:15 ` John Stultz
2015-02-18 18:11 ` David Ahern
2015-02-18 18:18 ` John Stultz
2015-02-18 18:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-02-18 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-18 19:00 ` Paul Bolle
2015-02-18 19:12 ` Paul Bolle
2015-02-18 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: add support for profiling jitted code Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150218175354.GA31963@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=johnmccutchan@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pawell.moll@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox