From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754933AbbBTPdd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:33:33 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39681 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754187AbbBTPda (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:33:30 -0500
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:33:29 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a
 modern way"
Message-ID: <20150220153329.GA18111@kroah.com>
References: <1423760350-20149-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
 <CACRpkdZGze_2=hWe414Eum_9hpNXgog5vmu6Y4R_zhg0x2z0SQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87bnkx6bja.fsf@free.fr>
 <20150219.152841.891912250243016754.davem@davemloft.net>
 <87egpl8w5q.fsf@free.fr>
 <CACRpkdZf4ceexYP8eNTcetbRoZ6RUoZjyh60CF4MK+w6gjUH+g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZf4ceexYP8eNTcetbRoZ6RUoZjyh60CF4MK+w6gjUH+g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:37:59AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> wrote:
> > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> >
> >>> Now if you can make it in -rc2 or -rc3, this revert should be forgotten. But if
> >>> you can't make it for 3.20, I'll push for the revert.
> >>>
> >>> So I think it's up to you now, and let's see what Gregh says about it.
> >>
> >> What is the current status of this?  I'd like to see this move forward so we
> >> can get this fixed ASAP.
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Linus has submitted the patch [1]. I'll be watching carefully until -rc4 that
> > this is applied. If it's not, I'll reping you to apply this revert. Until then,
> > you can forget about it, I'll do the follow-up.
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/18/310
> 
> Looping in Greg and Grant so they know we are waiting for their verdict
> on that patch...

I have no idea what you are talking about here :(