From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents: asm9260: Fix compilation error with sparc/sparc64 allyesconfig
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:49:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150223204924.GA5669@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54EB91BB.9020800@rempel-privat.de>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:46:51PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Am 23.02.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:27:01PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> >> Am 23.02.2015 um 20:10 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 08:00:51PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>>> The Kconfig options for the asm9260 timer is wrong as it can be selected by
> >>>> another platform with allyes config and thus leading to a compilation failure
> >>>> as some non arch related code is pulled by the compilation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fix this by having the platform Kconfig to select the timer as it is done for
> >>>> the others drivers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>>
> >>
> >> the thing is, this SoC or this company has no own IP cores. All of them
> >> are from other companies and providers, including this timer. This is
> >> why all modules for this SoC are selectable.
> >>
> > Maybe the modules should be selected by the architectures using the IP cores ?
>
> At the moment of pushing patches to arch/arm, maintainers preferred to
> have minimalistic Kconfig.
>
> > Either case, we'll need _some_ fix upstream, whatever is acceptable for the
> > maintainer.
>
> What is with initial white list patch?
>
I don't know. All I know is that the upstream kernel still has the problem,
and that it affects both sparc64-allmodconfig and sparc-allmodconfig.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-23 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-09 10:18 linux-next: Tree for Feb 9 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-09 17:20 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 9 (build failures) Guenter Roeck
2015-02-10 7:07 ` Oleksij Rempel
2015-02-10 12:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-10 15:57 ` [PATCH] clocksource: whitelist asm9260_timer driver for ARM Oleksij Rempel
2015-02-18 7:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-18 8:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-02-23 17:48 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-02-23 17:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-23 18:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-02-23 19:00 ` [PATCH] clockevents: asm9260: Fix compilation error with sparc/sparc64 allyesconfig Daniel Lezcano
2015-02-23 19:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-23 20:27 ` Oleksij Rempel
2015-02-23 20:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-23 20:46 ` Oleksij Rempel
2015-02-23 20:49 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-02-23 21:21 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-02-24 5:16 ` Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150223204924.GA5669@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox