From: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] x86/microcode: Consolidate family,model, ... code
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:23:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150224162343.GH4565@chrystal.uk.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424774232-5981-9-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:37:07AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> @@ -159,42 +134,40 @@ static enum ucode_state
> matching_model_microcode(struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
> unsigned long sig)
> {
> - u8 x86, x86_model;
> - u8 x86_ucode, x86_model_ucode;
> + unsigned int fam, model;
> + unsigned int fam_ucode, model_ucode;
> struct extended_sigtable *ext_header;
> unsigned long total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
> unsigned long data_size = get_datasize(mc_header);
> int ext_sigcount, i;
> struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
>
> - x86 = get_x86_family(sig);
> - x86_model = get_x86_model(sig);
> + fam = __x86_family(sig);
> + model = x86_model(sig);
>
> - x86_ucode = get_x86_family(mc_header->sig);
> - x86_model_ucode = get_x86_model(mc_header->sig);
> + fam_ucode = __x86_family(mc_header->sig);
> + model_ucode = x86_model(mc_header->sig);
>
> - if (x86 == x86_ucode && x86_model == x86_model_ucode)
> + if (fam == fam_ucode && model == model_ucode)
> return UCODE_OK;
>
> /* Look for ext. headers: */
> if (total_size <= data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE)
> return UCODE_NFOUND;
>
> - ext_header = (struct extended_sigtable *)
> - mc_header + data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE;
> + ext_header = (struct extended_sigtable *)mc_header + data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE;
> + ext_sig = (void *)ext_header + EXT_HEADER_SIZE;
I think we have another serious problem here, both in the original code and
in your patch - mc_header will first be casted to (unsigned long*) then
we'll add data_size and MC_HEADER_SIZE, potentially going way further than
intended. Same remark for ext_sig.
Quentin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 10:36 [PATCH 00/13] x86/microcode: Intel early loader cleanups Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/microcode/intel: Check if microcode was found before applying Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/microcode/intel: Do the mc_saved_src NULL check first Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 16:20 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/microcode/intel: Get rid of last arg to load_ucode_intel_bsp() Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 16:21 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-02-24 18:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify load_ucode_intel_bsp() Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 16:21 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-02-24 18:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86/microcode/intel: Make _save_mc() return the updated saved count Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 16:22 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/microcode/intel: Sanitize _save_mc() Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/microcode/intel: Rename update_match_revision() Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 16:23 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-04-10 11:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-10 11:54 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-04-10 12:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86/microcode: Consolidate family,model, ... code Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 16:23 ` Quentin Casasnovas [this message]
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify generic_load_microcode_early() Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/microcode/intel: Move mc arg last in get_matching_{microcode|sig} Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 16:24 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-05-05 9:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/microcode/intel: Sanitize microcode_pointer() Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/microcode/intel: Check scan_microcode()'s retval Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 10:37 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/microcode/intel: Fix printing of microcode blobs in show_saved_mc() Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 16:24 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-02-24 16:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-25 9:41 ` Quentin Casasnovas
2015-02-25 17:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-03 13:00 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Fix out of bounds memory access to the extended header tip-bot for Quentin Casasnovas
2015-02-24 16:40 ` [PATCH 00/13] x86/microcode: Intel early loader cleanups Quentin Casasnovas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150224162343.GH4565@chrystal.uk.oracle.com \
--to=quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox