From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752922AbbBXRAW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:00:22 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:40648 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751436AbbBXRAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:00:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:55:08 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: Markus Pargmann Cc: Lothar =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wa=DFmann?= , Dmitry Torokhov , Henrik Rydberg , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] input: ft5x06: Fix userspace reported maximum value Message-ID: <20150224165508.GY25269@lukather> References: <1415887618-29844-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20150223214936.GA16926@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5LZCLy8Sy7WgNZQM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150223214936.GA16926@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --5LZCLy8Sy7WgNZQM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Markus, On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:49:36PM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:06:54PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > The current ft5x06 reports to the user-space that its maximum > > coordinates are, on both X and Y, way higher than what could be > > actually usable on the screen (in my case, 5759x1151 instead of > > 480x800). > >=20 > > This causes trouble on some userspace stacks that then try to re-scale > > these coordinates back to the framebuffer resolution, like QT does. > >=20 > > Use the of_touchscreen code to find the real touchscreen limits in the > > DT case, and report that to the userspace. > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Maxime >=20 > any news on this? Unfortunately, no. I never got any review on this, and somehow forgot about it. I will rebase the patches on 4.0, and resend them. Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --5LZCLy8Sy7WgNZQM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU7KzrAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAghjMP/RH+zj/CJ1FxfD/HCuR6lvYu Fz55SzgkCmJ/pKvCddIXDBt4dfP4ErL+/3PUyKXofHm9JSIM01Xq4pdrRDAOWsJR KjCqnPNkgXj1GA9MFDIY8u6GOyPfKyN/aSQfm9EpwsqtfoCYuYKNG0lv+JH2HGor wv+DXjpESaF8J0IeEO92mZhBgEGcKlasF6x0TiAhqtKfmpa93jIPN2kqC8uV5Haf vLzkpx3tQGHPJ8ovBoEGaQlsZW1Gb17sKnkTS9DSxAgmdKkvtORcAonU0us/WcZu YkRvDgXdUAUwgfpg+BCD/ZgGCCy2etyXHGAbN90xTOwrcUgE761Gh8c1Yixo/jDN fX97EuB2IlaDZ/DQWK7Xoq74urHIu+M+T8Y57X7rgdTnZ0HIw4d7/cG60SK9wq/q kNn3i8t1c3JZPtFT2yPQvexk9CqMDc6iMU+Oq5Rsuaw8mIkuvJhX8fd93MoYx7Ac MOWALyRc637rpPGWDxWaW8ScTMjb4O/s1Uuhkz++HllyC7OnQpyJReQMmvyWErkS S7zuE5l4Y1dfl7ms6CLUBTS4kz6PdS9UOhBkn1OVuYAD5klzmZr1i1sZezLeoOu5 gv5DbxkJXUZjRZP2fau3KgqQC0eTCfaxQTFzFlg8r0dWlI8buu45q9sna17jRjwZ SGMsh6cmVWhLTqnOPrst =OnCI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5LZCLy8Sy7WgNZQM--