From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753635AbbBYVo7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:44:59 -0500
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:25720 "EHLO
	userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752784AbbBYVo4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:44:56 -0500
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:44:20 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
        Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
        Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        josh@joshtriplett.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, sam@ravnborg.org,
        Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/arm64: add xenconfig
Message-ID: <20150225214420.GB314@l.oracle.com>
References: <CAB=NE6V0QXGTQy70w_GZDFL6bQu7Lyj4DNR_4camJBKWiUpv3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB=NE6WM4QamjOpxNyVG6cKSZnKssYZKh159TKhEqQxdJHEX-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1502101415270.18749@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <1423607572.21685.1.camel@x220>
 <54EDEDD2.6090201@suse.cz>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1502251248440.18097@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <CAB=NE6VhWX18LELbWPygQ103ohgyjQF3nVrLBx3S1-92zgPf=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1502251310170.18097@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <20150225211915.GB31483@l.oracle.com>
 <CAB=NE6UM-Co37sZQFjh9J7h1N7eXp-AnuZTogUy88rPnLQ5i9A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB=NE6UM-Co37sZQFjh9J7h1N7eXp-AnuZTogUy88rPnLQ5i9A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:25:59PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:11:04PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> >> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am reworking Xen's kconfig stuff right now, so perhaps what is best
> >> > is for this series to be folded under those changes and I'd submit
> >> > them as the last series in the changes. That would avoid collateral
> >> > changes as I revamp tons of Xen kconfig things. This would then go
> >> > under David Vrabel's tree, but since it involves x86 stuff its unclear
> >> > if its OK for that -- I think so? Let me know.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Ok, sounds good, and I agree it would be better to hold off on doing this
> >> if there are going to be substantial changes to the config options later.
> >> I think once the x86 bits get an ack from one of the x86 guys that you
> >> should be good to go!
> >
> > Ingo (x86 guys) mentioned in one of his emails that he glosses over
> > emails if they say 'xen'.
> 
> Then this should be able to go through David Vrabel no, as he does care.

:-)
> 
> > Perhaps you need to change the title to be more catchy?
> 
> If folks don't want to deal with Xen patches it should be fine, but we
> do need a route upstream, this seems to make sense to go through David
> Vrabel in the future no?

Yes, any of the Xen maintainers (me, David, or Boris).

> 
>  Luis