From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] genirq: prevent system wakeup when dealing with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND IRQs
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:06:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150226090613.465c95a9@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1721977.3MjzADDQbj@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:01:31 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 10:56:00 AM Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Mixing IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and !IRQF_NO_SUSPEND on the same IRQ line is highly
> > discouraged, but in some cases (IRQ shared by a timer and other devices)
> > you don't have any other choice.
> > Since some devices sharing the IRQ line might tag it as a wakeup source,
> > you might end up with your handler that requested IRQF_NO_SUSPEND not
> > being called in suspended state, or invalid system wakeup (the system is
> > woken up without any wakeup source actually requesting it).
> >
> > To deal with such unlikely situations, you'll have to:
> > 1/ prevent any automatic wakeup when at least one of the IRQ users
> > registered with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
> > 2/ let IRQ users decide if/when they should wake the system up
> >
> > This patch is taking care of 1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/irq/pm.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> > index 3ca5325..1743162 100644
> > --- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
> > +++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> > @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@
> >
> > bool irq_pm_check_wakeup(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > {
> > - if (irqd_is_wakeup_armed(&desc->irq_data)) {
> > + if (irqd_is_wakeup_armed(&desc->irq_data) &&
> > + !desc->no_suspend_depth) {
> > irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED);
> > desc->istate |= IRQS_SUSPENDED | IRQS_PENDING;
> > desc->depth++;
> >
>
> I'm not sure how this helps, because irqd_is_wakeup_armed() is false for
> IRQs having no_suspend_depth different from zero (please see the first
> check in suspend_device_irq()).
>
>
Indeed, it seems I overlooked this test in suspend_device_irq, and this
makes my irq_is_wakeup_armed test useless.
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-26 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 9:55 [RFC PATCH 0/3] genirq: mixing IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and wakeup sources on shared IRQs Boris Brezillon
2015-02-24 9:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] genirq: prevent system wakeup when dealing with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND IRQs Boris Brezillon
2015-02-25 22:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 8:06 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2015-02-24 9:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] genirq: add helper functions to deal with wakeup on shared " Boris Brezillon
2015-02-25 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 8:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-24 9:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] rtc: at91sam9: properly act when IRQ handler is called in suspended state Boris Brezillon
2015-02-25 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 8:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-25 21:59 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] genirq: mixing IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and wakeup sources on shared IRQs Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 8:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-26 15:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 15:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-26 18:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 18:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-26 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 23:07 ` [PATCH] genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-27 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-27 22:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-27 22:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-04 19:42 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-04 20:00 ` [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND Mark Rutland
2015-03-04 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 22:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 22:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-05 11:04 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-05 11:33 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-05 12:07 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-06 0:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 21:30 ` [PATCH] genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150226090613.465c95a9@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox