From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752756AbbCAUjJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2015 15:39:09 -0500 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:56331 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751261AbbCAUjH (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2015 15:39:07 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 13:39:04 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mark Brown Cc: Adrian Remonda , "open list:SPI SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities Message-ID: <20150301133904.37212fea@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20150228072742.GM6236@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> References: <1424891324-24784-1-git-send-email-adrianremonda@gmail.com> <20150227151117.15a79baa@lwn.net> <20150228072742.GM6236@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 16:27:42 +0900 Mark Brown wrote: > > (Meanwhile, I've applied this one). > > Sorry, I shoud've been clearer that my previous mail was intended as a > nack for the patch as submitted - I'd expected SPI documentation/test > code updates to be going via the SPI tree. I begin to understand why docs maintainers tend not to hang around for long :) I've dropped the commit. In the future I'll ignore patches to Documentation/spi. jon