From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 1425199286-16376-1-git-send-email-mattew8898@gmail.com
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Staging: dgnc: replace EXTRA_CFLAGS
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:05:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150301180506.GA32433@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425231605.3928.5.camel@gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 06:40:05PM +0100, Matteo Semenzato wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 01/03/2015 alle 09.26 -0800, Greg KH ha scritto:
> > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 06:19:57PM +0100, Matteo Semenzato wrote:
> > > From: Matteo Semenzato <mattew8898@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > This patch removes EXTRA_CFLAGS from the Makefile and defines DDG_PART
> > > in dgnc_driver.h
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matteo Semenzato <mattew8898@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/dgnc/Makefile | 2 --
> > > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_driver.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/Makefile b/drivers/staging/dgnc/Makefile
> > > index b69f7b6..995c874 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/Makefile
> > > @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
> > > -EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DDG_NAME=\"dgnc-1.3-16\" -DDG_PART=\"40002369_F\"
> > > -
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_DGNC) += dgnc.o
> > >
> > > dgnc-objs := dgnc_cls.o dgnc_driver.o\
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_driver.h b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_driver.h
> > > index a8157eb..0b718a8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_driver.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_driver.h
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> > > #define PROCSTR "dgnc" /* /proc entries */
> > > #define DEVSTR "/dev/dg/dgnc" /* /dev entries */
> > > #define DRVSTR "dgnc" /* Driver name string */
> > > +#define DG_PART "40002369_F"
> >
> > Why do we need this define?
> >
> > And why doesn't it use the same formatting as the other ones in this
> > list?
>
> DG_PART is being used in dgnc_mgmt.c and dgnc_sysfs.c
What it is being used for? Can it be removed? Is it just there for
informational purposes or does the code actually do something based on
the value?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-01 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-01 8:41 [PATCH] Staging: dgnc: replace EXTRA_CFLAGS Matteo Semenzato
2015-03-01 16:41 ` Greg KH
2015-03-01 17:19 ` [PATCH V2] " Matteo Semenzato
2015-03-01 17:26 ` Greg KH
2015-03-01 17:40 ` Matteo Semenzato
2015-03-01 18:05 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-01 18:35 Matteo Semenzato
2015-03-01 19:56 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150301180506.GA32433@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=1425199286-16376-1-git-send-email-mattew8898@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox