From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753489AbbCBDh7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2015 22:37:59 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52615 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752240AbbCBDh6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2015 22:37:58 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 19:37:57 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Tomas Winkler Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [char-misc-next 02/18 V2] mei: revamp me clients list handling Message-ID: <20150302033757.GA19294@kroah.com> References: <1423905288-12830-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1423905288-12830-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:14:48AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > 1. Use rw lock to access the me_clients list > > 2. Reuse already defined find functions also when > removing particular me client > > 3. Add wrappers for addition and deletion > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler > --- > V2: add missing mei_me_cl_put() calls to mei_host_client_init Crap, I applied v1, and didn't see this, can you send a fix-up patch that is the difference here? thanks, greg k-h