From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754643AbbCBTUq (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:20:46 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:50453 "EHLO mail-qa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753983AbbCBTUp (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:20:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:20:40 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: Stefan Bader , Sander Eikelenboom , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 3.19: device name associates with IRQ's for ahci controllers operating with a single IRQ changed from "ahci?" to "" Message-ID: <20150302192040.GC8051@htj.duckdns.org> References: <534449189.20150209205457@eikelenboom.it> <54D9B9FA.9030900@canonical.com> <20150210145120.GI3220@htj.duckdns.org> <20150216172841.GA23072@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20150302172108.GN17694@htj.duckdns.org> <20150302185809.GA23808@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20150302191049.GA8051@htj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150302191049.GA8051@htj.duckdns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 02:10:49PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hmmm... it does stand out like a sore thumb and we probably should use > a more descriptive identifier including the driver name. 4f37b50 > ("libata: Use dev_name() was fine for the specific platform device as > the device identifier included ide but not generally. :( > > How about driver name followed by device ID? Or we can move print_id allocation to host allocation time and do ata%d-%d:DRIVER_NAME -- tejun