public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch/module: Do not patch modules that are not ready
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 08:55:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150303145517.GA16889@treble.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425382709-9934-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz>

Hi Petr,

Good find.  Some comments below.

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:38:29PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> There is a notifier that handles live patches for coming and going modules.
> It takes klp_mutex lock to avoid races with coming and going patches.
> 
> Unfortunately, there are some possible races in the current implementation.
> The problem is that we do not keep the klp_mutex lock all the time when
> the module is being added or removed.
> 
> First, the module is visible even before ftrace is ready. If we enable a patch
> in this time frame, adding ftrace ops will fail and the patch will get rejected
> just because bad timing.
> 
> Second, if we are "lucky" and enable the patch for the coming module when the
> ftrace is ready but before the module notifier has been called.

Based on the notifier priorities, it looks like the ftrace notifier gets
called last, so I think this particular case can't happen.

> The notifier
> will try to enable the patch as well. It will detect that it is already patched,
> return error, and the module will get rejected just because bad timing.
> The more serious problem is that it will not call the notifier for
> going module, so that the mess will stay there and we wont be able to load
> the module later.
> 
> Third, similar problems are there for going module. If a patch is enabled after
> the notifier finishes but before the module is removed from the list of modules,
> the new patch will be applied to the module. The module might disappear at
> anytime when the patch enabling is in progress, so there might be an access out
> of memory. Or the whole patch might be applied and some mess will be left,
> so it will not be possible to load/patch the module again.
> 
> This patch solves the problem by adding two flags into struct module. They are
> switched when the notifier is called. Note that we try to solve a race with a
> coming patch, therefore we do not know which modules will get patched and we
> need to monitor all modules. This is why I added this to the struct module.
> 
> The flags are set and checked under the klp_mutex lock. The related operation
> is finished under the same lock. Therefore they are properly serialized now.
> 
> Note that the patch solves only the situation when a new patch is registered or
> enabled.

Did we have a reason for calling klp_find_object_module() in both
register and enable?  I'd think we'd only need it for the register path,
since the notifier would catch any future loads/unloads.  Or am I
missing something?

> There are no such problems when the patch is being removed. it does
> not matter who disable the patch first, whether the normal disable_patch() or
> the module notifier. There is nothing to do once the patch is disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
> ---
>  include/linux/module.h  |  5 +++++
>  kernel/livepatch/core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/module.c         |  6 +++++-
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index b653d7c0a05a..7e50d87da510 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -344,6 +344,11 @@ struct module {
>  	unsigned long *ftrace_callsites;
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> +	bool klp_patched;
> +	bool klp_unpatched;
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD
>  	/* What modules depend on me? */
>  	struct list_head source_list;
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index a664e485365f..dee4bbcb60e6 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ static bool klp_is_object_loaded(struct klp_object *obj)
>  /* sets obj->mod if object is not vmlinux and module is found */
>  static void klp_find_object_module(struct klp_object *obj)
>  {
> +	struct module *mod;
> +
>  	if (!klp_is_module(obj))
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -98,7 +100,14 @@ static void klp_find_object_module(struct klp_object *obj)
>  	 * the klp_mutex, which is also taken by the module notifier.  This
>  	 * prevents any module from unloading until we release the klp_mutex.
>  	 */
> -	obj->mod = find_module(obj->name);
> +	mod = find_module(obj->name);
> +	/* Do not mess work of the module notifier */
> +	if ((mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING && !mod->klp_patched) ||
> +	    (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_GOING && mod->klp_unpatched))
> +		obj->mod = NULL;
> +	else
> +		obj->mod = mod;
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
>  }
>  

Why do we need two flags for this?  The notifer already
sets/clears obj->mod, so can we rely on the value obj->mod to determine
if the notifier already ran?

For example:

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static bool klp_is_object_loaded(struct klp_object *obj)
 /* sets obj->mod if object is not vmlinux and module is found */
 static void klp_find_object_module(struct klp_object *obj)
 {
-	if (!klp_is_module(obj))
+	if (!klp_is_module(obj) || obj->mod)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
@@ -98,7 +98,9 @@ static void klp_find_object_module(struct klp_object *obj)
 	 * the klp_mutex, which is also taken by the module notifier.  This
 	 * prevents any module from unloading until we release the klp_mutex.
 	 */
-	obj->mod = find_module(obj->name);
+	mod = find_module(obj->name);
+	if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_LIVE)
+		obj->mod = mod;
 	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
 }
 
> @@ -927,6 +936,15 @@ static int klp_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&klp_mutex);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Each module has to know that the notifier has been called.
> +	 * We never know what module will get patched by a new patch.
> +	 */
> +	if (action == MODULE_STATE_COMING)
> +		mod->klp_patched = true;
> +	else
> +		mod->klp_unpatched = true;
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry(patch, &klp_patches, list) {
>  		for (obj = patch->objs; obj->funcs; obj++) {
>  			if (!klp_is_module(obj) || strcmp(obj->name, mod->name))
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index d856e96a3cce..8357f15b7ed0 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -852,7 +852,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(delete_module, const char __user *, name_user,
>  
>  	/* Store the name of the last unloaded module for diagnostic purposes */
>  	strlcpy(last_unloaded_module, mod->name, sizeof(last_unloaded_module));
> -
>  	free_module(mod);
>  	return 0;
>  out:

Gratuitous whitespace change.

> @@ -3271,6 +3270,11 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
>  	}
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> +	mod->klp_patched = false;
> +	mod->klp_unpatched = false;
> +#endif
> +
>  	/* To avoid stressing percpu allocator, do this once we're unique. */
>  	err = percpu_modalloc(mod, info);
>  	if (err)
> -- 
> 1.8.5.6
> 

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03 11:38 [RFC PATCH] livepatch/module: Do not patch modules that are not ready Petr Mladek
2015-03-03 14:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2015-03-03 15:48   ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-03 16:01     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-03 17:34   ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-03 19:31     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-03 19:35       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-03 23:02       ` [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: fix patch module loading race Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-03 23:02         ` [PATCH 1/2] livepatch: remove unnecessary call to klp_find_object_module() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-04  9:00           ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-04 21:48           ` Jiri Kosina
2015-03-03 23:02         ` [PATCH 2/2] livepatch: fix patched module loading race Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-04 13:17           ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-04 14:18             ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-04 15:34             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-04 15:51               ` Jiri Kosina
2015-03-04 16:41                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-04 16:36               ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-04 17:57                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-04 22:02                   ` Jiri Kosina
2015-03-04 22:45                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-05  0:52             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-03-05 14:18               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-06  1:24                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-03-06 10:51                   ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-06 11:37                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-03-06 13:05                       ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-06 14:43                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-03-05 14:24               ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150303145517.GA16889@treble.redhat.com \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox