From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756110AbbCDEwM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:52:12 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:46174 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752390AbbCDEwL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:52:11 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 05:52:04 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: Fix sibling map with NumaChip
Message-ID: <20150304045204.GA5158@gmail.com>
References: <1425444511-22450-1-git-send-email-daniel@numascale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1425444511-22450-1-git-send-email-daniel@numascale.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale.com> wrote:

> v3: Test against boot cpu features to correct behaviour on larger systems
>     with global IO

> +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) {

Hm, so why doesn't this_cpu_has() work? Supposedly such flags ought to 
be symmetric on all CPUs in the system?

Thanks,

	Ingo