From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932753AbbCDJXi (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 4 Mar 2015 04:23:38 -0500
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:49513 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932546AbbCDJXf (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Mar 2015 04:23:35 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:22:21 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: Fix sibling map with NumaChip
Message-ID: <20150304092221.GG3233@pd.tnic>
References: <1425444511-22450-1-git-send-email-daniel@numascale.com>
 <20150304045204.GA5158@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150304045204.GA5158@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:52:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Hm, so why doesn't this_cpu_has() work? Supposedly such flags ought to 
> be symmetric on all CPUs in the system?

Actually, static_cpu_has_safe() should be the fastest and the safest to
use in all cases.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--