From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: at91: remove SoC headers
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:15:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150304171505.GH3989@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8819576.zV70Ce3SCo@wuerfel>
On 04/03/2015 at 18:03:45 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Wednesday 04 March 2015 15:47:25 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > @@ -21,6 +21,14 @@
> > #include "generic.h"
> > #include "soc.h"
> >
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_USART3 0xfc00c000 /* (USART3 non-secure) Base Address */
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_PMC 0xf0018000 /* (PMC) Base Address */
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_MPDDRC 0xf0010000 /* (MPDDRC) Base Address */
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_PIOD 0xfc068000 /* (PIOD) Base Address */
> > +
> > +/* Some other peripherals */
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_SYS2 SAMA5D4_BASE_PIOD
> >
>
> Why are these still needed? I would expect that the code using them
> can be removed as well.
>
Yeah, that is still something I need to investigate. Nicolas told me it
doesn't work without it. My guess is that it has something to do with
secure booting.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 14:47 [PATCH 0/6] Switch mach-at91 to multiplatform Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: at91: switch " Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 23:21 ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-04 23:35 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 23:43 ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: at91: switch at91_dt_defconfig " Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: at91: remove unused headers Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: at91: remove useless mach/cpu.h Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: at91: remove SoC headers Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 17:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-04 17:15 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-03-04 19:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-12 13:28 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: at91: remove hardware.h Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150304171505.GH3989@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox