* Removal of IRQF_DISABLED
@ 2015-03-04 9:53 Valentin Rothberg
2015-03-04 17:45 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Rothberg @ 2015-03-04 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tony, akpm, linux-kernel
Hi,
Andrew asked me to prepare one big patch that removes the
IRQF_DISABLED flag entirely. I already sent a few small patches that
remove the usage of this flag, two of them [1, 2] have been applied
by Tony to omap-for-v4.1/l3. Hence, I cannot remove the definition
now and leave the files of [1, 2] untouched.
I don't want to break anything or cause troubles while merging. So
shall I wait until v4.1 to send the big patch or is there are nice way
to get it merged now (e.g., getting [1, 2] into omap-for-v4.0)?
Kind regards,
Valentin
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/2/306
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/2/492
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Removal of IRQF_DISABLED
2015-03-04 9:53 Removal of IRQF_DISABLED Valentin Rothberg
@ 2015-03-04 17:45 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-04 19:02 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2015-03-04 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valentin Rothberg; +Cc: tony, linux-kernel
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:53:07 +0100 Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew asked me to prepare one big patch that removes the
> IRQF_DISABLED flag entirely. I already sent a few small patches that
> remove the usage of this flag, two of them [1, 2] have been applied
> by Tony to omap-for-v4.1/l3. Hence, I cannot remove the definition
> now and leave the files of [1, 2] untouched.
>
> I don't want to break anything or cause troubles while merging. So
> shall I wait until v4.1 to send the big patch or is there are nice way
> to get it merged now (e.g., getting [1, 2] into omap-for-v4.0)?
>
You're over-sweating this - merging patches is what we do ;)
Just send the patch, against current Linus mainline and I'll work it
out.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Removal of IRQF_DISABLED
2015-03-04 17:45 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2015-03-04 19:02 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2015-03-04 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Valentin Rothberg, linux-kernel
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [150304 09:46]:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:53:07 +0100 Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Andrew asked me to prepare one big patch that removes the
> > IRQF_DISABLED flag entirely. I already sent a few small patches that
> > remove the usage of this flag, two of them [1, 2] have been applied
> > by Tony to omap-for-v4.1/l3. Hence, I cannot remove the definition
> > now and leave the files of [1, 2] untouched.
> >
> > I don't want to break anything or cause troubles while merging. So
> > shall I wait until v4.1 to send the big patch or is there are nice way
> > to get it merged now (e.g., getting [1, 2] into omap-for-v4.0)?
> >
>
> You're over-sweating this - merging patches is what we do ;)
>
> Just send the patch, against current Linus mainline and I'll work it
> out.
Yeah and I'll drop my omap-for-v4.1/l3 branch no problem. I don't yet
have anything applied on top of those two patches.
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-04 19:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-04 9:53 Removal of IRQF_DISABLED Valentin Rothberg
2015-03-04 17:45 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-04 19:02 ` Tony Lindgren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox