From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752232AbbCDXg5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:36:57 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:52694 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751201AbbCDXg4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:36:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 00:35:58 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Paul Bolle Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: at91: switch to multiplatform Message-ID: <20150304233558.GK3989@piout.net> References: <1425480446-31711-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1425480446-31711-2-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1425511307.2090.60.camel@tiscali.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1425511307.2090.60.camel@tiscali.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/03/2015 at 00:21:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote : > > +config ARCH_AT91 > > + select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB > > select COMMON_CLK_AT91 > > - select CPU_V7 > > + select CLKDEV_LOOKUP > > select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS > > - select MEMORY > > - select ATMEL_SDRAMC > > - select PHYLIB if NETDEVICES > > - > > -menu "Atmel AT91 System-on-Chip" > > - > > -choice > > - > > - prompt "Core type" > > - > > -config SOC_SAM_V4_V5 > > - bool "ARM9 AT91SAM9/AT91RM9200" > > - help > > - Select this if you are using one of Atmel's AT91SAM9 or > > - AT91RM9200 SoC. > > + select IRQ_DOMAIN > > + select NEED_MACH_IO_H if PCCARD > > + select PINCTRL > > + select PINCTRL_AT91 > > + select SOC_BUS > > + select USE_OF > > + bool > > Utterly trivial, but anyhow. Could you please make this > bool > > line to be the line directly following the line reading > config ARCH_AT91 > > above? > I can definitely do that, is your parser relying on it? :) -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com