From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755367AbbCELEm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:04:42 -0500
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:56646 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755213AbbCELEk (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:04:40 -0500
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:04:11 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
        Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
Message-ID: <20150305110411.GC13617@leverpostej>
References: <1424771762-16343-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
 <8151717.nkhnGBri9h@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20150226191724.0ae4ca4e@bbrezillon>
 <6864616.1aRDSmSsvx@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20150304194246.GF22156@leverpostej>
 <20150304200040.GA12126@leverpostej>
 <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +0000, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> tiny tiny nitpick:
> 
> On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
>   ^ an

Whoops.

Rafael, are you happy to fix that up, or would you like me to resend?

> > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
> > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
> > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
> 
> And genuine question, should we use British English or American English
> or we don't care ?

Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read
over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious.

I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most
important thing.

Mark.