public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:33:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150305113306.GP3989@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150305110411.GC13617@leverpostej>

On 05/03/2015 at 11:04:11 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
> > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
> > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
> > 
> > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English
> > or we don't care ?
> 
> Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read
> over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious.
> 
> I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most
> important thing.

I'd say signalling vs signaling. I actually had to look up which one was
correct. I'm personally using Incorrect/Broken English so I'm definitely
not here to give lessons.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-05 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-24  9:55 [RFC PATCH 0/3] genirq: mixing IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and wakeup sources on shared IRQs Boris Brezillon
2015-02-24  9:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] genirq: prevent system wakeup when dealing with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND IRQs Boris Brezillon
2015-02-25 22:01   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26  8:06     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-24  9:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] genirq: add helper functions to deal with wakeup on shared " Boris Brezillon
2015-02-25 22:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26  8:09     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-24  9:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] rtc: at91sam9: properly act when IRQ handler is called in suspended state Boris Brezillon
2015-02-25 22:05   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26  8:12     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-25 21:59 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] genirq: mixing IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and wakeup sources on shared IRQs Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26  8:03   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-26 15:44     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 15:47       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-26 18:17         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 18:17           ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-26 21:55             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-26 23:07             ` [PATCH] genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-27  8:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-27 22:13                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-27 22:11                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-04 19:42               ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-04 20:00                 ` [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND Mark Rutland
2015-03-04 21:55                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 22:17                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 22:27                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-05 11:04                     ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-05 11:33                       ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-03-05 12:07                         ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-06  0:54                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 21:30                 ` [PATCH] genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150305113306.GP3989@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox