Re: [PATCH] Remove redhat'ism from ftrace selftests.

[Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:14:42AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
 > On 03/04/2015 06:18 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
 > > On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 21:44 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
 > >>
 > >> I think that there's no need to even call true or echo..
 > >>
 > >> From 0549544e8e982df6478f11e2b4fe419f94c22434 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 > >> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
 > >> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:26:38 +0900
 > >> Subject: [PATCH] ftracetest: Do not use usleep
 > >>
 > >> The usleep is only provided on distros from Redhat so running ftracetest
 > >> on other distro resulted in failures due to the missing usleep.
 > >>
 > >> The reason of using [u]sleep in the test was to generate (scheduler)
 > >> events.  But as we use 'cat trace | grep | wc -l' to read the events,
 > >> the command themselves already generate some events before reading the
 > >> trace file so no need to call [u]sleep explicitly.
 > >>
 > >> Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
 > >> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
 > >> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
 > > 
 > > Thanks, this is working for me.
 > > 
 > > Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
 > > 
 > 
 > Steve,
 > 
 > Do you want to make a call on which one you want me to take it
 > through between these two patches - one from Dave and the other
 > from Namhyung Kim.
 > 
 > Please send me the patch I have to pull in. Namhyung Kim's patch
 > isn't in the format I can apply and I don't have Dave's patch in
 > my inbox.

Removing it entirely sounds like a much better choice, so I'd
wait for Namhyung to resend.

	Dave