From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965084AbbCEQAl (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:00:41 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:36516 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945983AbbCEQAi (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:00:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:00:33 +0000 From: Al Viro To: John Stoffel Cc: NeilBrown , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support follow_link in RCU-walk. Message-ID: <20150305160032.GB29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20150305051530.23906.65097.stgit@notabene.brown> <20150305060520.GY29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <21752.24468.376138.308459@quad.stoffel.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21752.24468.376138.308459@quad.stoffel.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:52:20AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote: > So what happens if your filesystem is 10Tb in size, and you have 50 > million files and lots of them are symlinks? I've got developers who > do shit like this and wonder why performance sucks.... and I just > worry that GPF_KERNEL is a limited resource. But maybe 64bit systems > won't really have any problems? What would keep all those symlinks' contents pinned in page cache?