From: Andrew Vagin <avagin@parallels.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 17:19:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150306141948.GA10521@paralelels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150305141140.7b76e130@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 02:11:40PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:37:18 +0300
> Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> wrote:
>
> > Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in
> > its fdinfo file.
> >
> > Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock.
> > We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported
> > there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a
> > child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which
> > can be reused by another process.
> >
> > $ cat /proc/locks
> > ...
> > 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF
> > ...
> >
> > $ ps -C rpcbind
> > PID TTY TIME CMD
> > 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind
> >
> > $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4
> > pos: 0
> > flags: 0100000
> > mnt_id: 22
> > lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF
> >
> > $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4
> > lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock
> >
> > $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/
> > total 0
> > lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0
> > lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0
> > lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0
> >
> > You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock.
> >
> > This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file
> > locks.
> >
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
> > Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> > Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 4 ++++
> > fs/locks.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/proc/fd.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> > include/linux/fs.h | 7 +++++++
> > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
...
> > +struct files_struct;
> > +static inline void show_fd_locks(struct seq_file *f,
> > + struct file *filp, struct files_struct *files) {}
> > #endif /* !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING */
> >
> >
>
> Looks reasonably sane to me. Via what tree should this go in?
I don't know. I think all previous patches about fdinfo went through
linux-mm. Andrew, what do you think?
>
> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Thanks,
Andrey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-06 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-05 15:37 [PATCH] proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Andrey Vagin
2015-03-05 19:11 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-06 14:19 ` Andrew Vagin [this message]
2015-03-06 8:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-03-06 14:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-03-07 13:00 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-11 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-12 15:54 ` Andrew Vagin
2015-03-12 19:23 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-12 21:31 ` Andrey Wagin
2015-03-12 16:30 ` [PATCH] selftest: add a test case to check how locks are shown in fdinfo Andrey Vagin
2015-03-12 20:43 ` Shuah Khan
2015-03-13 9:34 ` Andrew Vagin
2015-03-13 13:46 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150306141948.GA10521@paralelels.com \
--to=avagin@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox