public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Vagin <avagin@parallels.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 17:19:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150306141948.GA10521@paralelels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150305141140.7b76e130@tlielax.poochiereds.net>

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 02:11:40PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu,  5 Mar 2015 18:37:18 +0300
> Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> wrote:
> 
> > Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in
> > its fdinfo file.
> > 
> > Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock.
> > We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported
> > there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a
> > child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which
> > can be reused by another process.
> > 
> > $ cat /proc/locks
> > ...
> > 6: FLOCK  ADVISORY  WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF
> > ...
> > 
> > $ ps -C rpcbind
> >   PID TTY          TIME CMD
> >   332 ?        00:00:00 rpcbind
> > 
> > $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4
> > pos:	0
> > flags:	0100000
> > mnt_id:	22
> > lock:	1: FLOCK  ADVISORY  WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF
> > 
> > $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4
> > lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar  5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock
> > 
> > $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/
> > total 0
> > lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0
> > lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0
> > lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0
> > 
> > You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock.
> > 
> > This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file
> > locks.
> > 
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
> > Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> > Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt |  4 ++++
> >  fs/locks.c                         | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/proc/fd.c                       | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  include/linux/fs.h                 |  7 +++++++
> >  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 

...

> > +struct files_struct;
> > +static inline void show_fd_locks(struct seq_file *f,
> > +			struct file *filp, struct files_struct *files) {}
> >  #endif /* !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING */
> >  
> >  
> 
> Looks reasonably sane to me. Via what tree should this go in?

I don't know. I think all previous patches about fdinfo went through
linux-mm. Andrew, what do you think?

> 
> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>

Thanks,
Andrey

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-06 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-05 15:37 [PATCH] proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Andrey Vagin
2015-03-05 19:11 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-06 14:19   ` Andrew Vagin [this message]
2015-03-06  8:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-03-06 14:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-03-07 13:00   ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-11 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-12 15:54   ` Andrew Vagin
2015-03-12 19:23     ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-12 21:31       ` Andrey Wagin
2015-03-12 16:30 ` [PATCH] selftest: add a test case to check how locks are shown in fdinfo Andrey Vagin
2015-03-12 20:43   ` Shuah Khan
2015-03-13  9:34     ` Andrew Vagin
2015-03-13 13:46       ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150306141948.GA10521@paralelels.com \
    --to=avagin@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avagin@openvz.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox