From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753937AbbCFRwc (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:52:32 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:50082 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751814AbbCFRwb (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:52:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 09:52:32 -0800 From: Darren Hart To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: wmi: Remove private %pUL implementation Message-ID: <20150306175232.GC19001@vmdeb7> References: <1424787330-26770-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1424787330-26770-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > The work performed by wmi_gtoa is equivalent to simply sprintf(out, > "%pUL", in), so one could replace its body by this. However, most > users feed the result directly as a %s argument to some other function > which also understands the %p extensions (they all ultimately use > vsnprintf), so we can eliminate some stack buffers and quite a bit of > code by just using %pUL directly. > > In wmi_dev_uevent I'm not sure whether there's room for a > nul-terminator in env->buf, so I've just replaced wmi_gtoa with the > equivalent sprintf call. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Nice cleanup, thanks Rasmus. Queued for 4.1. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center