Re: [PATCH] kernel/locking/locktorture: fix deadlock in 'rw_lock_irq' type

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 03:06:53AM +0300, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
> torture_rwlock_read_unlock_irq() must use read_unlock_irqrestore()
> instead of write_unlock_irqrestore().
> 
> Use read_unlock_irqrestore() instead of write_unlock_irqrestore().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com>

Good catch!  If Davidlohr has no objections, I will queue this one.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/locking/locktorture.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> index ec8cce2..6a2723c 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int torture_rwlock_read_lock_irq(void) __acquires(torture_rwlock)
>  static void torture_rwlock_read_unlock_irq(void)
>  __releases(torture_rwlock)
>  {
> -	write_unlock_irqrestore(&torture_rwlock, cxt.cur_ops->flags);
> +	read_unlock_irqrestore(&torture_rwlock, cxt.cur_ops->flags);
>  }
> 
>  static struct lock_torture_ops rw_lock_irq_ops = {
> -- 
> 1.7.1
>