From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756925AbbCGJHL (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2015 04:07:11 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:47341 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751816AbbCGJG5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2015 04:06:57 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:06:21 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Mark Rutland , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Boris Brezillon , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Wim Van Sebroeck , "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" , Alessandro Zummo , "rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , Mike Turquette , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Alexandre Belloni , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] watchdog: at91sam9: request the irq with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND Message-ID: <20150307090621.GL23367@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1425287898-15093-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1425287898-15093-6-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150304183809.GD22156@leverpostej> <14143668.0aRkeVrc3Q@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150305105729.GB13617@leverpostej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:10:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > enable_irq_wake() has no effect on IRQF_NO_SUSPEND interrupts, so if the > driver uses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, it does not need to use enable_irq_wake() > in addition to that. I still feel we should BUG when someone is calling enable_irq_wake() on an irq with only one desc which has NO_SUSPEND set.