From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] rcu: Cleanup rcu_init_geometry() code and arithmetics
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:08:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150307180821.GN5236@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6ef7c6894f62f35acc8b358c856d8cce2ff25b3.1425735920.git.agordeev@redhat.com>
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 06:03:38PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> This update simplifies rcu_init_geometry() code flow
> and makes calculation of the total number of rcu_node
> structures more easy to read.
>
> The update relies on the fact num_rcu_lvl[] is never
> accessed beyond rcu_num_lvls index by the rest of the
> code. Therefore, there is no need initialize the whole
> num_rcu_lvl[].
>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
The rest of this series looks promising, but I do have to ask... How have
you tested these? The most straightforward approach would be to find
a KVM-capable system with at least 16 CPUs and type the following from
the top-level directory:
sh tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 34 --duration 5
This will do a series of 16 build-boot-test cycles with various configs
(including various rcu_node tree shapes), and print a summary of the
outcome at the end.
For these sorts of changes, I usually also do some user-level testing.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index fb89630..f9ef1e0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3854,7 +3854,6 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
> {
> ulong d;
> int i;
> - int j;
> int rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS + 1];
>
> /*
> @@ -3905,24 +3904,21 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
> return;
> }
>
> + /* Calculate the number of levels in the tree. */
> + for (i = 0; nr_cpu_ids > rcu_capacity[i]; i++) {
> + }
> + rcu_num_lvls = i;
> +
> /* Calculate the number of rcu_nodes at each level of the tree. */
> - for (i = 1; i <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
> - if (nr_cpu_ids <= rcu_capacity[i]) {
> - for (j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
> - int cap = rcu_capacity[i - j];
> - num_rcu_lvl[j] = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, cap);
> - }
> - rcu_num_lvls = i;
> - for (j = i + 1; j <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; j++)
> - num_rcu_lvl[j] = 0;
> - break;
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++) {
> + int cap = rcu_capacity[rcu_num_lvls - i];
> + num_rcu_lvl[i] = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, cap);
> + }
>
> /* Calculate the total number of rcu_node structures. */
> rcu_num_nodes = 0;
> - for (i = 0; i <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
> rcu_num_nodes += num_rcu_lvl[i];
> - rcu_num_nodes -= nr_cpu_ids;
> }
>
> void __init rcu_init(void)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-07 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-07 17:03 [PATCH 0/9] rcu: Cleanup RCU tree initialization Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] rcu: Panic if RCU tree can not accommodate all CPUs Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 18:48 ` Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 21:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Remove superfluous local variable in rcu_init_geometry() Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 18:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] rcu: Cleanup rcu_init_geometry() code and arithmetics Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 18:08 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-03-07 18:59 ` Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 21:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_geometry() capacity arithmetics Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Limit rcu_state::levelcnt[] to RCU_NUM_LVLS items Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] rcu: Limit rcu_capacity[] size " Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] rcu: Remove unnecessary fields from rcu_state structure Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] rcu: Limit count of static data to the number of RCU levels Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] rcu: Simplify arithmetic to calculate number of RCU nodes Alexander Gordeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150307180821.GN5236@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox