public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] rcu: Cleanup rcu_init_geometry() code and arithmetics
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:08:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150307180821.GN5236@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6ef7c6894f62f35acc8b358c856d8cce2ff25b3.1425735920.git.agordeev@redhat.com>

On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 06:03:38PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> This update simplifies rcu_init_geometry() code flow
> and makes calculation of the total number of rcu_node
> structures more easy to read.
> 
> The update relies on the fact num_rcu_lvl[] is never
> accessed beyond rcu_num_lvls index by the rest of the
> code. Therefore, there is no need initialize the whole
> num_rcu_lvl[].
> 
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>

The rest of this series looks promising, but I do have to ask...  How have
you tested these?  The most straightforward approach would be to find
a KVM-capable system with at least 16 CPUs and type the following from
the top-level directory:

sh tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 34 --duration 5

This will do a series of 16 build-boot-test cycles with various configs
(including various rcu_node tree shapes), and print a summary of the
outcome at the end.

For these sorts of changes, I usually also do some user-level testing.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index fb89630..f9ef1e0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3854,7 +3854,6 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
>  {
>  	ulong d;
>  	int i;
> -	int j;
>  	int rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS + 1];
> 
>  	/*
> @@ -3905,24 +3904,21 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
> +	/* Calculate the number of levels in the tree. */
> +	for (i = 0; nr_cpu_ids > rcu_capacity[i]; i++) {
> +	}
> +	rcu_num_lvls = i;
> +
>  	/* Calculate the number of rcu_nodes at each level of the tree. */
> -	for (i = 1; i <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
> -		if (nr_cpu_ids <= rcu_capacity[i]) {
> -			for (j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
> -				int cap = rcu_capacity[i - j];
> -				num_rcu_lvl[j] = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, cap);
> -			}
> -			rcu_num_lvls = i;
> -			for (j = i + 1; j <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; j++)
> -				num_rcu_lvl[j] = 0;
> -			break;
> -		}
> +	for (i = 0; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++) {
> +		int cap = rcu_capacity[rcu_num_lvls - i];
> +		num_rcu_lvl[i] = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, cap);
> +	}
> 
>  	/* Calculate the total number of rcu_node structures. */
>  	rcu_num_nodes = 0;
> -	for (i = 0; i <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
>  		rcu_num_nodes += num_rcu_lvl[i];
> -	rcu_num_nodes -= nr_cpu_ids;
>  }
> 
>  void __init rcu_init(void)
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-07 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-07 17:03 [PATCH 0/9] rcu: Cleanup RCU tree initialization Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] rcu: Panic if RCU tree can not accommodate all CPUs Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:42   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 18:48     ` Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 21:52       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Remove superfluous local variable in rcu_init_geometry() Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 18:03   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] rcu: Cleanup rcu_init_geometry() code and arithmetics Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 18:08   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-03-07 18:59     ` Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 21:47       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_geometry() capacity arithmetics Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Limit rcu_state::levelcnt[] to RCU_NUM_LVLS items Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] rcu: Limit rcu_capacity[] size " Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] rcu: Remove unnecessary fields from rcu_state structure Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] rcu: Limit count of static data to the number of RCU levels Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-07 17:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] rcu: Simplify arithmetic to calculate number of RCU nodes Alexander Gordeev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150307180821.GN5236@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox