From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932136AbbCJPos (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:44:48 -0400
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:38854 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751188AbbCJPom (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:44:42 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:44:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
        "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        "acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@arm.com>, Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm/pmu: Reject groups spanning multiple hardware
 PMUs
Message-ID: <20150310154410.GF2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1425905192-10509-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <1425905192-10509-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <20150310112723.GY2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20150310120521.GD28168@leverpostej>
 <20150310125351.GD2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20150310153608.GB31849@leverpostej>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150310153608.GB31849@leverpostej>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:36:08PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On the assumption that the patch is otherwise OK, how about the commit
> message below?

Yeah, that'll do fine. Thanks!