From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751830AbbCKJsQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 05:48:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:33942 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751459AbbCKJsN (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 05:48:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:18:06 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Dan Carpenter , teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com, Greg KH , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] staging: sm750fb: Use memset_io instead of memset Message-ID: <20150311094806.GE4560@sudip-PC> References: <1426037325-8392-1-git-send-email-lstoakes@gmail.com> <20150311085433.GU10964@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:11:52AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On 11 March 2015 at 08:54, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > Btw, do you have this hardware? Are you able to test these changes? > > Unfortunately not, I am trying to keep these changes as simple code > fixes that ought not to affect actual hardware behaviour as I can > (though of course you can never be entirely sure that's the case!) > > I suspect that Sudip must have some real hardware, is this the case > Sudip? If it isn't too presumptuous of me to ask, perhaps you might be > able to check patches that are successfully merged into > staging-testing? yes, i have the hardware and will test on it. but your patch 5/6 and 6/6 is scaring me :) regards sudip > > Best, > > -- > Lorenzo Stoakes > https:/ljs.io