public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	acme@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf report: ordered events and flushing bug
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:11:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316011116.GN943@sejong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150312205053.GC2301@redhat.com>

Hi Arnaldo,

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:50:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:06:46PM -0400, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 3/12/15 1:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > >>
> > >> What the point of having all the ordered event logic if you are saying
> > >> events
> > >> must be saved in order. I don't think there is a way to make that
> > >> guarantee
> > >> when monitoring multiple CPUs at the same time.
> > >
> > >
> > > The record command does not analyze the events, it just copies from mmap to
> > > file in lumps per mmap. e.g., on a given round the perf data file has events
> > > like this:
> > >
> > >    111112223344444444555566666F111111111
> > >    |<------- round --------->|^
> > >                               |
> > >         finished round event -|
> > >
> > > where 11111 are events read from mmap1, 2222 are events from mmap2, etc. F
> > > is the finished round event which a pass over all mmaps has been done.
> > >
> > > So for mmap1 all of the 11111 events are in time order, then jumping to
> > > mmap2 events the 2222 times are time sorted relative to mmap2 but not
> > > relative to mmap1 events.
> > >
> > > The ordered events code sorts the clumps into a time based stream:
> > >     123141641445124564234645656...
> > >
> > In my case I care about time ordering the mmap records between themselves
> > because they overlap on the address range.
> 
> Right, Namhyung, do you keep all the MMAP records as well? Looking at
> the threaded patchkit I see:
> 
> -----------------
> [PATCH 23/38] perf tools: Add a test case for timed map groups handling
> 
> A test case for verifying thread->mg and ->mg_list handling during
> time change and new thread__find_addr_map_time() and friends.
> -----------------
> 
> You said:
> 
> Subject: [PATCH 19/37] perf tools: Introduce thread__find_addr_location_time() and friends
> 
> The *_time() variants are for find appropriate map (and symbol) at the
> given time.  This is based on the fact that map_groups list is sorted
> by time in the previous patch.
> ----------------
> 
> Running out of time here, but I couldn't find code where you keep
> 'struct map' that overlaps and that could then be looked up using
> timestamp in addition to the addr being looked up, that is needed for
> parallely process samples having first processed all PERF_RECORD_MMAP
> events.

It currently keeps only 'map_groups' per fork/exec so overlapped
'struct map' are not treated well assuming it's a rare event.  But
with the JIT map injection, it certainly also needs to keep 'struct
map' by timestamp - I'll work on it for the next spin.

Thanks,
Namhyung

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-16  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-12  3:32 [BUG] perf report: ordered events and flushing bug Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12  7:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-03-12  9:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-12 19:05   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 19:13     ` David Ahern
2015-03-12 19:23       ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 19:34         ` David Ahern
2015-03-12 19:39           ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 19:53             ` David Ahern
2015-03-12 20:06               ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 20:50                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-16  1:11                   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-03-12 20:16               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-12 20:24                 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 20:27       ` Adrian Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150316011116.GN943@sejong \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox