From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86) (v12)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:25:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316032550.GA1110@thin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426447459-28620-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 03:24:19PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Here is an implementation of a new system call, sys_membarrier(), which
> executes a memory barrier on either all running threads of the current
> process (MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_FLAG) or calls synchronize_sched() to issue
> a memory barrier on all threads running on the system. It can be used to
> distribute the cost of user-space memory barriers asymmetrically by
> transforming pairs of memory barriers into pairs consisting of
> sys_membarrier() and a compiler barrier. For synchronization primitives
> that distinguish between read-side and write-side (e.g. userspace RCU,
> rwlocks), the read-side can be accelerated significantly by moving the
> bulk of the memory barrier overhead to the write-side.
>From a quick review, this seems quite reasonable (as it did 5 years
ago).
One request: Could you please add a config option (default y) in the
EXPERT menu to disable this? You actually seem to already have it
marked as a cond_syscall.
Also, a very minor nit: flags in kernel APIs aren't typically named with
a _FLAG suffix.
With the syscall made optional, and with or without that naming nit
fixed:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
- Josh Triplett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-15 19:24 [RFC PATCH] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86) (v12) Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-15 22:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-16 3:25 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2015-03-16 13:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 14:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-16 15:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 15:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-16 16:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-16 15:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 15:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 18:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 1:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17 2:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17 6:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 11:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 14:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 12:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-18 1:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17 6:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 11:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 12:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 13:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17 16:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 17:55 ` josh
2015-03-17 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 17:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150316032550.GA1110@thin \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox