public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86) (v12)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:25:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316032550.GA1110@thin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426447459-28620-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 03:24:19PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Here is an implementation of a new system call, sys_membarrier(), which
> executes a memory barrier on either all running threads of the current
> process (MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_FLAG) or calls synchronize_sched() to issue
> a memory barrier on all threads running on the system. It can be used to
> distribute the cost of user-space memory barriers asymmetrically by
> transforming pairs of memory barriers into pairs consisting of
> sys_membarrier() and a compiler barrier. For synchronization primitives
> that distinguish between read-side and write-side (e.g. userspace RCU,
> rwlocks), the read-side can be accelerated significantly by moving the
> bulk of the memory barrier overhead to the write-side.

>From a quick review, this seems quite reasonable (as it did 5 years
ago).

One request: Could you please add a config option (default y) in the
EXPERT menu to disable this?  You actually seem to already have it
marked as a cond_syscall.

Also, a very minor nit: flags in kernel APIs aren't typically named with
a _FLAG suffix.

With the syscall made optional, and with or without that naming nit
fixed:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

- Josh Triplett

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-16  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-15 19:24 [RFC PATCH] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86) (v12) Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-15 22:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-16  3:25 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2015-03-16 13:00   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 14:24   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-16 15:49     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 15:49     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-16 16:12       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-16 15:43   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 15:57     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 17:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 17:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 18:53       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 20:54         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17  1:45           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17  2:26             ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17  6:40               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 11:44                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 14:10                   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17 16:35                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 12:46               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-18  1:06                 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17  6:30             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 11:56               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 12:01                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 13:13               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17 16:36                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17 16:48                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 17:55                   ` josh
2015-03-17 16:37                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 16:49                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 17:00                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 17:24     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150316032550.GA1110@thin \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox