From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753482AbbCPIRY (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:17:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:34488 "EHLO mail-wg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751615AbbCPIRV (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:17:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:17:16 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Daniel Lezcano , Boris Brezillon , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: syscon: Add atmel system timer registers definition Message-ID: <20150316081716.GF3383@x1> References: <1426162054-9987-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1426162054-9987-3-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20150313080315.GC3383@x1> <20150313104032.GG4329@piout.net> <550315C7.7010403@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <550315C7.7010403@atmel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 13/03/2015 11:40, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > On 13/03/2015 at 08:03:15 +0000, Lee Jones wrote : > >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > >> > >>> AT91RM920 has a memory range reserved for timer and watchdog configuration. > >>> Expose those registers so that drivers can make use of the system timer syscon > >>> declared in at91 DTs. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > >>> Acked-by: Lee Jones > >>> --- > >>> include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-st.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) > >>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-st.h > >> > >> Applied, thanks. > > > Actually, I was thinking this could go through the at91 to avoid > > depending on your branch. > > Lee, > > I was planning to take the whole series with me to limit the number of > merge conflicts and dependencies. > Do you mind if I take this patch with the other AT91 cleanup patches > through the arm-soc tree? > If you are okay, can you remove this patch already applied on your tree? Yes, no problem. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog