public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@amd.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: svm: remove SVM_EXIT_READ_CR* intercepts
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:34:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316173459.GB14216@potion.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550701C5.8050603@amd.com>

2015-03-16 11:16-0500, Joel Schopp:
> On 03/12/2015 04:20 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > 2015-03-12 15:17-0500, Joel Schopp:
> >> There isn't really a valid reason for kvm to intercept cr* reads
> >> on svm hardware.  The current kvm code just ends up returning
> >> the register
> > There is no need to intercept CR* if the value that the guest should see
> > is equal to what we set there, but that is not always the case:
> > - CR0 might differ from what the guest should see because of lazy fpu
> Based on our previous conversations I understand why we have to trap the
> write to the CR0 ts bit for lazy fpu, but don't understand why that
> should affect a read.

KVM keeps one CR0 with guest's state (svm.vcpu.arch.cr0) and a second
one that is loaded to hardware CR0 on VMRUN (svm.vmcb->save.cr0);
these two might not match.
If we didn't intercept read, it would return hardware CR0, so the guest
could do CLTS (change svm.vcpu.arch.cr0) and read CR0.TS = 1, because of
lazy FPU.

Correct emulation is what we want.

> > CR2 and CR8 already aren't intercepted, so it looks like only CR0 and
> > CR4 could use some optimizations.
> I'll send out a v2 with these less aggressive optimizations.

Thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2015-03-16 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-12 20:17 [PATCH] kvm: x86: svm: remove SVM_EXIT_READ_CR* intercepts Joel Schopp
2015-03-12 21:17 ` Bandan Das
2015-04-03 12:19   ` Radim Krčmář
2015-03-12 21:20 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-03-16 16:16   ` Joel Schopp
2015-03-16 17:34     ` Radim Krčmář [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150316173459.GB14216@potion.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel.schopp@amd.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox