[PATCH] staging: fsl-mc: Corrected email addresses in TODO file

[PATCH] staging: fsl-mc: Corrected email addresses in TODO file

[J. German Rivera]

Signed-off-by: J. German Rivera <German.Rivera@freescale.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fsl-mc/TODO | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/TODO b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/TODO
index 49ebfd9..d78288b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/TODO
+++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/TODO
@@ -8,5 +8,6 @@
 * Add at least one device driver for a DPAA2 object (child device of the
   fsl-mc bus).
 
-Please send any patches to Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
-devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+Please send any patches to Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
+german.rivera@freescale.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
+linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-- 
2.3.2

Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc: Corrected email addresses in TODO file

[Alexander Graf]

On 12.03.15 04:52, J. German Rivera wrote:
> Signed-off-by: J. German Rivera <German.Rivera@freescale.com>

Greg, going forward, how would you prefer to get patches for fsl-mc?
There are a few options that I can see:

  1) individual patches on the ML for review, directly applied by you
  2) individual patches on the ML for review, regular big patch sets
from German to you
  3) individual patches on the ML for review, regular pull requests from
German to you


I would personally prefer either 2 or 3, as that allows German to be the
gatekeeper and grow responsibility for the upstream tree.

Alex

Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc: Corrected email addresses in TODO file

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:14:42AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12.03.15 04:52, J. German Rivera wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: J. German Rivera <German.Rivera@freescale.com>
> 
> Greg, going forward, how would you prefer to get patches for fsl-mc?
> There are a few options that I can see:
> 
>   1) individual patches on the ML for review, directly applied by you
>   2) individual patches on the ML for review, regular big patch sets
> from German to you
>   3) individual patches on the ML for review, regular pull requests from
> German to you
> 
> 
> I would personally prefer either 2 or 3, as that allows German to be the
> gatekeeper and grow responsibility for the upstream tree.

2 is fine, but note that I will pick up "cleanup" patches automatically,
no need for anyone else to be involved, as that's part of being in
staging.

thanks,

greg k-h