From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86/asm/entry/64: Enable interrupts *after* we fetch PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:36:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150317143614.GA18462@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426600344-8254-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> wrote:
> Without this change, it is still not possible to get rid of
> PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp) usage in switch_to: if preemption happens
> while we did not fetch PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp) and stored it in pt_regs->sp,
> PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp) gets corrupted by other task's user sp.
Well, wouldn't this be a much clearer explanation:
"We want to use PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp) as a simple temporary register,
to shuffle user-space RSP into (and from) when we set up the system
call stack frame. At that point we cannot shuffle values into general
purpose registers, because we have not saved them yet.
To be able to do this shuffling into a memory location, we must be
atomic and must not be preempted while we do the shuffling, otherwise
the 'temporary' register gets overwritten by some other task's
temporary register contents ..."
Agreed?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-17 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 13:52 [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86/asm/entry/64: Enable interrupts *after* we fetch PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp) Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-17 14:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-17 14:36 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-17 15:09 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-17 16:42 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Denys Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150317143614.GA18462@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox