From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
dwysocha@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hung_task: split for_each_process_thread() into for_each_process() + __for_each_thread()
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:25:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150317192521.GB32579@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150317192450.GA32579@redhat.com>
Preparation. Change the main loop in check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks()
to use the nested for_each_process() + __for_each_thread() loops explicitly.
Note that we use __for_each_thread(), not for_each_thread(). This way it
is clear that the inner loop doesn't depend on 'g' after we read ->signal.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/hung_task.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
index e0f90c2..4735b99 100644
--- a/kernel/hung_task.c
+++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
@@ -169,17 +169,22 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
return;
rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process_thread(g, t) {
- if (!max_count--)
- goto unlock;
- if (!--batch_count) {
- batch_count = HUNG_TASK_BATCHING;
- if (!rcu_lock_break(g, t))
+ for_each_process(g) {
+ struct signal_struct *sig = g->signal;
+
+ __for_each_thread(sig, t) {
+ if (!max_count--)
goto unlock;
+
+ if (!--batch_count) {
+ batch_count = HUNG_TASK_BATCHING;
+ if (!rcu_lock_break(g, t))
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+ /* use "==" to skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks */
+ if (t->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
+ check_hung_task(t, timeout);
}
- /* use "==" to skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks waiting on NFS */
- if (t->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
- check_hung_task(t, timeout);
}
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-17 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 14:13 [PATCH 0/1] hung_task: Change hung_task.c to use for_each_process_thread() Aaron Tomlin
2015-03-17 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Aaron Tomlin
2015-03-17 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-03-17 17:18 ` Aaron Tomlin
2015-03-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] hung_task: improve rcu_lock_break() logic Oleg Nesterov
2015-03-17 19:25 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-03-20 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] hung_task: split for_each_process_thread() into for_each_process() + __for_each_thread() Aaron Tomlin
2015-03-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] hung_task: improve the rcu_lock_break() logic Oleg Nesterov
2015-03-20 16:55 ` Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150317192521.GB32579@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox